Abstract

Studies of university writing assignments demonstrate inconsistencies in the elements examined, making it difficult to achieve a clear understanding of the range, frequency, and characteristics of assignments that students might encounter. In this research study, syllabi from one university college were analyzed to determine the types and frequency of assignments and how these assignments vary by program and level. A total of 179 syllabi from all courses taught during 1 academic year were collected. On average, 2.5 writing assignments per course were assigned. Almost half of all assignments were 4 pages or less in length. Though length and grade value of assignments were significantly correlated, students did not write significantly longer or more high-stakes assignments as they progressed. The most common type of assignment was the term or research paper, though task labels were highly variable. Program profiles revealed differences between programs in frequency of assignments, learning goals, nested assignments, and in-process feedback. Implications for Writing Across the Curriculum programming and the development of departmental writing profiles are discussed.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2010-07-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088310371635
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Reflections: A Journal of Community-Engaged Writing and Rhetoric
  2. Teaching English in the Two-Year College
  3. Research in the Teaching of English

References (14) · 4 in this index

  1. Across the Disciplines
  2. 10.17239/L1ESLL-2008.08.02.04
  3. Written Communication
  4. 10.2307/3587338
  5. 10.1080/19388079209558094
Show all 14 →
  1. Gaining ground in college writing: Tales of development and interpretation
  2. Making the most of college: Students speak their minds
  3. Peer Review
  4. Research in the Teaching of English
  5. 10.37514/LLD-J.2003.6.1.05
    Language and Learning Across the Disciplines  
  6. College Composition and Communication
  7. Paltridge, B. ( 2002). Genre, text type, and the English for Academic Purposes (EAP) classroom. In A. Johns (…
  8. Where do the naturalistic studies of WAC/WID point? A research review
  9. Journal of Business and Technical Communication