The Impact of No Child Left Behind on Teachers' Writing Instruction

Sarah J. McCarthey University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

Abstract

The study uses Foucault's framework of governmentality to understand the impact of No Child Left Behind (NCLB) on teachers' writing instruction and attitudes toward writing in high- and low-income schools. Using interviews and observations of 18 teachers, the study identified four themes: emphasis on testing, curricular effects, awareness of lower-achieving students, and concerns for English language learners. While teachers shared concerns in those areas, there were differences in how teachers from high- and low-income schools experienced the impact of NCLB on their writing instruction. The study suggests that NCLB has affected teacher morale as well as the nature and amount of writing instruction, but that school contexts figure into teachers' instruction. The example of one teacher from a low-income school demonstrates the potential for teachers to resist the coercive aspects of NCLB through their writing instruction.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2008-10-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088308322554
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (7)

  1. Writing and Pedagogy
  2. College English
  3. Research in the Teaching of English
  4. Written Communication
  5. Written Communication
Show all 7 →
  1. Written Communication
  2. Computers and Composition

References (78) · 5 in this index

  1. 10.1207/s15548430jlr3702_2
  2. 10.58680/la20075659
    Language Arts  
  3. NERA Journal
  4. Radical possibilities: Public policy, urban education, and a new social movement
  5. Armbruster, B., McCarthey, S.J. & Cummins, S. (2005). Writing to learn in elementary classrooms. In R. Indris…
Show all 78 →
  1. The Salt Lake Tribune
  2. The psychology of written composition
  3. 10.1007/978-1-349-21718-2
  4. Boscolo, P. (2008). Writing in primary school. In C. Bazerman (Ed.), Handbook of research on writing: History…
  5. The art of teaching writing
  6. Units of study for primary writing: A yearlong curriculum, K-2
  7. Units of study for teaching writing, 3-5
  8. 10.3102/0002831207306760
  9. Choices, changes, and challenges: Curriculum and instruction in the NCLB era
  10. Written Communication
  11. Research in the Teaching of English
  12. Preschool through elementary writing
  13. The powers of literacy
  14. 10.1080/13613320701503207
  15. Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society
  16. The Salt Lake Tribune
  17. 10.17763/haer.58.3.c43481778r528qw4
  18. Dragonology
  19. Literacy in the library: Negotiating the spaces between order and desire
  20. Using social theory in educational research
  21. Language Arts
  22. Educational Leadership
  23. 10.3102/00028312028002337
  24. 10.58680/la20075656
    Language Arts  
  25. 10.3102/0002831207306767
  26. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison
  27. Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In L. M. Martin et al. (Eds.), Technologies of the self (pp. 1…
  28. Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell et al. (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmen…
  29. 10.3102/0013189X07306556
  30. 10.1080/13613320701503256
  31. Can students benefit from process writing? (NAEP Facts No. 1)
  32. Graham, S. (2006). Strategy instruction and the teaching of writing: A Meta-analysis. In C. A. MacArthur et a…
  33. 10.1086/461758
  34. A fresh look at writing
  35. 10.1177/0013124592024002006
  36. 10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00097.x
  37. The testing trap: How state writing assessments control learning
  38. 10.1080/13613320701503264
  39. 10.3102/0002831207306764
  40. Research in the Teaching of English
  41. Did reading first work?
  42. The shame of the nation
  43. 10.1080/089356902101242288
  44. Powerful writing, responsible teaching
  45. 10.1086/499665
  46. 10.1086/505441
  47. 10.1086/505442
  48. Qualitative data analysis
  49. Murphy, S. (2007). Some consequences of writing assessment. In A. Havnes & L. McDowell (Eds.), Balancing dile…
  50. Because writing matters
  51. Language Arts
  52. Taking stock: The writing process movement in the '90s
  53. Collateral damage: How high stakes testing corrupts America's schools
  54. The Reading First Program's grant application process: Final inspection report, September…
  55. Research in the Teaching of English
  56. The heart of the matter: The coaching model in America's Choice schools
  57. Quinn, J. (2006). How well do you understand Utah's school accountability systems? In, Issues and Action (p. …
  58. Reading Today
  59. 10.17763/haer.62.4.d522623315485031
  60. Research in the Teaching of English
  61. Shanahan, T. (2006). Where does writing fit in reading? In C. Cummins (Ed.), Understanding and implementing r…
  62. The Salt Lake Tribune
  63. 10.1086/505437
  64. 10.4324/9781410600905
  65. Creating writers through 6-trait writing assessment and instruction
  66. Harvard Educational Review
  67. 10.1086/499677
  68. The unraveling of No Child Left Behind: How negotiated changes transform the law
  69. Reading first
  70. Standards and assessments peer review guidance: Information and examples for Meeting the …
  71. Valdés, G. (1999). Incipient bilingualism and the development of English language writing abilities in the se…
  72. 10.3102/0002831207306859
  73. 10.58680/la20075654
    Language Arts