Narrative Knowers, Expository Knowledge

Abstract

Occasional dissent notwithstanding, “expository” prose—usually conceived as depersonalized and decontextualized—continues to be the main focus of most writing instruction at the secondary and college levels. This article critically examines the opposition of objectified exposition and personal narrative posited by rhetorical tradition and maintained by most composition texts and syllabi today. The liveliness of recent cross-disciplinary discussions regarding the narrative as a uniquely rich mode of thought and discourse contrasts rather sharply with the negative and often impoverished assumptions about storied prose held by most composition theorists and teachers. Unsupported by empirical evidence, such assumptions reflect a cultural bias that prefers abstractions to stories and fails to grasp their dynamic interplay. Where writing instruction is concerned, narrative and exposition are best perceived as poles of a dialectic, with personal experience informing one's interest in abstract knowledge beyond the self, the understanding self becoming enlarged as it “takes in” what is “out there.” The best thinking and writing, it is argued, are at once personal and public, both infused with private meaning and focused upon the world beyond the self.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
1990-01-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088390007001003
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Cites in this index (10)

  1. Research in the Teaching of English
  2. Research in the Teaching of English
  3. Research in the Teaching of English
  4. Written Communication
  5. College Composition and Communication
Show all 10 →
  1. Written Communication
  2. College Composition and Communication
  3. College Composition and Communication
  4. College Composition and Communication
  5. Research in the Teaching of English
Also cites 40 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.3102/00346543054004577
  2. 10.58680/la198525838
    Language Arts  
  3. 10.2307/747251
  4. 10.2307/357587
  5. Subjective criticism
  6. The closing of the American mind
  7. 10.1080/14640747608400579
  8. Actual minds, possible worlds
  9. Story and discourse
  10. 10.2307/356607
  11. 10.2307/357717
  12. 10.2307/357749
  13. 10.2307/376357
  14. 10.1016/S0022-5371(78)90164-0
  15. Ways of Worldmaking
  16. 10.1017/S0047404500009039
  17. 10.1080/01638538309544557
  18. 10.1016/0304-422X(80)90012-1
  19. 10.1016/0010-0285(77)90006-8
  20. 10.1017/S0047404500008861
  21. 10.2307/j.ctt1x76fmp.5
  22. 10.17763/haer.47.3.8840364413869005
  23. 10.1016/0304-422X(81)90039-5
  24. 10.1037/0003-066X.40.10.1081
  25. 10.3138/utq.53.2.149
  26. 10.2307/377219
  27. The psychology of literacy
  28. 10.1093/past/85.1.3
  29. 10.1007/BF02208897
  30. 10.2307/747422
  31. 10.1037/0022-0663.74.3.323
  32. 10.3102/00028312020004517
  33. 10.2307/747358
  34. 10.1016/0010-0285(77)90005-6
  35. 10.58680/la198326307
    Language Arts  
  36. On narrative
  37. Metahistory: The historical imagination in nineteenth-century Europe
  38. The tropics of discourse: Essays in cultural criticism
  39. 10.2307/357604
  40. 10.2307/376877
CrossRef global citation count: 17 View in citation network →