Coherence and Cognitive Style

Abstract

The primary hypothesis was that field independent subjects would produce discourse that would be judged more coherent than the discourse of field dependent subjects. A total of 44 subjects in their first term of college composition were selected from a group of 60 volunteers from two universities and a community college. Each subject was administered the Culture Fair Intelligence Test, the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire, and the Group Embedded Figures Test. There were five research conditions: Three evoked oral responses, and one evoked a written response. A group of readers unaware of the nature of the research evaluated each response holistically, rating it in terms of a coherence scale. Coherence scores were then analyzed in relation to cognitive style classification. The primary hypothesis was supported by the data. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated significant cognitive style effect, F(6,25) = 4.82, p <.0001. The correlation between cognitive style and coherence was significant, r(32) = .54, p <.002. The results suggest that cognitive style is a significant variable in explaining differences between good writers and poor ones.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
1985-10-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088385002004008
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication

Cites in this index (5)

  1. College English
  2. Research in the Teaching of English
  3. Research in the Teaching of English
  4. Research in the Teaching of English
  5. Research in the Teaching of English
Also cites 18 works outside this index ↓
  1. How to do things with words
  2. 10.2307/357898
  3. 10.1037/0022-0663.76.5.820
  4. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1969.tb01761.x
  5. 10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80006-9
  6. 10.1080/00461527309529093
  7. 10.2307/357897
  8. 10.1037/h0093916
  9. 10.1016/0191-8869(83)90018-1
  10. Discourse strategies
  11. Cohesion in English
  12. 10.1016/0361-476X(84)90014-6
  13. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
  14. 10.1037/h0037053
  15. 10.1016/S0022-5371(76)90039-6
  16. Psychological differentiation
  17. 10.2307/356693
  18. 10.2307/1127355
CrossRef global citation count: 10 View in citation network →