Physicists Reading Physics

Abstract

Reading, as well as writing, is a constructive activity. Interviews and observations of research physicists reveal reading processes permeated with individual purposes and schema. These schema, or personal maps of the field, include not only consensual knowledge about the phenomena being discussed, but also perceptions as to the most promising lines of current work, methods that are most likely to produce good results, and personal knowledge about the other workers in the field. Schema thus are formed around the active research purposes of the reader. Equally, purposes are framed within the researcher's schematic understanding of the field. With schema and purposes evolving dialectically, texts are read, not as static arguments, but as part of the dynamic process of research activity.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
1985-01-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088385002001001
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (13)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Written Communication
Show all 13 →
  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Written Communication
  6. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  7. Written Communication
  8. Written Communication

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 12 works outside this index ↓
  1. Subjective criticism
  2. A social interaction model of reading
  3. Life history of a knowledge claim: The opiate receptor case
  4. The dynamics of literary response
  5. 10.7202/036788ar
    Etudes Francaises  
  6. 10.1037/h0034822
  7. Influence of questions on the allocation of attention during reading
  8. Cultural schemata and reading comprehension
  9. 10.1177/030631277800800305
  10. Register, cohesion, and cross-cultural reading comprehension
  11. The reader in the text
  12. Reader response criticism
CrossRef global citation count: 184 View in citation network →