Abstract

In this study, we analyzed how students from different interpretive communities shape their academic texts. Prospective educational researchers, prospective reading specialists, prospective teachers, and prospective nurses read an educational research article from which we had deleted the discussion section. After they had read the article, subjects completed it by writing a discussion section. We analyzed subjects' texts in terms of writers' manipulation of both content and procedural knowledge. Our findings suggest that mere participation in an interpretive community without explicit instruction in its ways of writing can enhance students' ability to write in that community. Our findings also suggest that participation in one interpretive community can facilitate writing in another community, provided the communities share discourse conventions.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
1991-07-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088391008003003
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (9)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Research in the Teaching of English
  3. Research in the Teaching of English
  4. Written Communication
  5. Written Communication
Show all 9 →
  1. Research in the Teaching of English
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. College English
Also cites 9 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1177/004839318101100305
  2. 10.2307/1179517
  3. 10.1080/00220671.1985.10885643
  4. 10.2307/357859
  5. 10.1016/0304-422X(81)90039-5
  6. 10.1080/01638538709544687
  7. 10.2307/377164
  8. The uses of argument
  9. 10.1177/004839318101100307
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network →