Abstract

Digital media offer innovative ways of resolving crises of trust. This essay discusses a campaign that aimed to rebuild public trust in banks during the financial crisis. The campaign reflected a strategy (well-known in conflict resolution) that is best described as an online exercise in active listening. The essay discusses the potential of such a campaign and argues that in a crisis where rhetorical agency is impaired due to declining trust, corporations that engage in public listening may communicate acknowledgment and openness to change. However, in order to realize this potential, the public must be entrusted with a meaningful role as contributor to the campaign in the discursive and technical design of the medium of interaction. In the case studied, the campaign texts explicitly invited participation, but implicitly restrained the rhetorical agency of the public. This undermined the initiative's ability to renew the cognitive and emotional grounds for trust.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2013-10-01
DOI
10.1080/02773945.2013.839820
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly

Cites in this index (5)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  5. College Composition and Communication
Also cites 29 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.7208/chicago/9780226014685.001.0001
  2. 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00298.x
  3. A Rhetoric of Motives
  4. 10.1080/1479142042000332134
  5. 10.1007/s10676-008-9159-5
  6. 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00394.x
  7. 10.1080/10570319309374430
  8. 10.1515/nor-2017-0138
    Nordicom Review  
  9. 10.1080/03637759509376345
  10. Dilemmas of Trust
  11. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2003.08.005
  12. 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2009.01349.x
  13. 10.1353/rap.2002.0029
  14. 10.1016/S0363-8111(99)00020-X
  15. 10.2307/2216409
  16. 10.1080/10417940509373327
  17. 10.2307/2578601
  18. 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01490.x
  19. 10.1017/CBO9780511659959.010
  20. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.04.006
  21. 10.1177/0893318903256227
  22. 10.1080/10417949909373128
  23. 10.1080/10510978609368214
  24. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2007.02.011
  25. 10.1080/10627260802557605
  26. 10.1177/1461444807082691
  27. 10.1353/rap.2005.0072
  28. 10.1177/0021943608317112
  29. 10.1080/00335637309383176
CrossRef global citation count: 11 View in citation network →