Abstract

Using Colin Powell's 2003 pre-war speech to the UN as a case study, this essay illustrates ways in which discourse analytic methods can serve investigations of constitutive rhetoric. Prior to the speech, Powell's reluctance to go to war and his skepticism of the need for military action in Iraq was well known. His conversion to the administration's position was key to the persuasiveness of the speech. Thus, within the speech he needed to reconstitute his ethos from doubter to advocate. The analysis focuses on how specific linguistic qualities such as modality, positioning, narrative, and evaluation assist Powell in doing so. These discourse analytic tools reveal ways in which discrete linguistic moves contribute to the constitutive work of ethos formation and re-formation.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2012-10-01
DOI
10.1080/02773945.2012.704121
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Written Communication

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 15 works outside this index ↓
  1. The Cambridge Introduction to Narrative.
  2. 10.1215/03335372-22-1-1
  3. 10.1007/s10503-009-9154-y
  4. 10.1086/448619
  5. 10.1080/00335638709383799
  6. 10.1075/jnlh.7.25mak
    Journal of narrative and life history  
  7. 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x
  8. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research
  9. 10.1075/ni.16.1.16geo
  10. 10.1177/0959354308101417
  11. Rhetoric in Detail: Discourse Analyses of Rhetorical Talk and Text
  12. 10.1007/s10503-009-9150-2
  13. 10.1353/rap.2004.0026
  14. 10.1093/applin/10.1.1
  15. 10.4135/9781446221884.n7
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network →