Abstract

In recent years, scholars in rhetoric and composition studies have given increased attention to the various ways that rhetoric and religion intersect. To explore this relationship further, this article employs Kenneth Burke's dramatistic pentad and the methods of pentadic analysis proposed by Floyd Anderson and Lawrence Prelli in order to analyze two texts, Crowley's Toward a Civil Discourseand Obama's “Pentecost 2006 Keynote Address.” In our analysis, we aim to reveal the motives locked within Crowley's and Obama's texts to demonstrate how their attempts to open the universe of discourse—that is, to provide ways of bridging the divide between political liberals and religious conservatives—shut down the possibility for dialogue. We then offer counterstatements—what Anderson and Prelli refer to as “expressions of alternative orientations toward social reality” (90)—that may serve to open the universe of discourse.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2008-07-15
DOI
10.1080/02773940802167575
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly

Cites in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric Review
Also cites 5 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1080/00335638309383632
  2. 10.1080/10510977909368018
  3. 10.1080/00335637409383223
  4. 10.1080/00335638509383737
  5. 10.1080/00335639309384027
CrossRef global citation count: 10 View in citation network →