Abstract

This content analysis examined how the authors of 114 peer-reviewed journal articles explained their empirical approaches to visual rhetoric scholarship. Our content analysis sought to answer the question: how do scholars engage with the material dimensions of visual culture, specifically in terms of artifact selection and reporting data collection procedures? The answers to this question, we argue, are needed urgently as visual rhetoric research continues to expand because inconsistent reporting will hinder replicability and the reader’s access to the author’s argument. We use the findings of our content analysis to surface the implicit norms of empirical visual rhetoric research and to develop recommendations for reporting visual data collection procedures.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
2018-05-22
DOI
10.1080/10572252.2018.1479777
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (20) · 5 in this index

  1. 10.4135/9781412983402
  2. Technical Communication
  3. 10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00355.x
  4. Journal of the Northwest Communication Association
  5. 10.1080/1479142042000244970
Show all 20 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  4. Picturing poverty: Print culture and FSA photographs
  5. 10.1353/rap.2005.0037
  6. 10.5840/jcr20012414
    Journal of Communication & Religion  
  7. No caption needed: Iconic photographs, public culture, and liberal democracy
  8. 10.1080/19312450709336664
  9. 10.1080/00028533.2005.11821634
  10. Technical Communication Quarterly
  11. 10.1177/1470593104044089
  12. 10.1080/15551393.2011.548726
  13. 10.4135/9781412983488
  14. 10.4135/9781412986069
  15. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication