Abstract

This content analysis examined how the authors of 114 peer-reviewed journal articles explained their empirical approaches to visual rhetoric scholarship. Our content analysis sought to answer the question: how do scholars engage with the material dimensions of visual culture, specifically in terms of artifact selection and reporting data collection procedures? The answers to this question, we argue, are needed urgently as visual rhetoric research continues to expand because inconsistent reporting will hinder replicability and the reader’s access to the author’s argument. We use the findings of our content analysis to surface the implicit norms of empirical visual rhetoric research and to develop recommendations for reporting visual data collection procedures.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
2018-05-22
DOI
10.1080/10572252.2018.1479777
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (5)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Also cites 11 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.4135/9781412983402
  2. 10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00355.x
  3. 10.1080/1479142042000244970
  4. 10.1353/rap.2005.0037
  5. 10.5840/jcr20012414
    Journal of Communication & Religion  
  6. 10.1080/19312450709336664
  7. 10.1080/00028533.2005.11821634
  8. 10.1177/1470593104044089
  9. 10.1080/15551393.2011.548726
  10. 10.4135/9781412983488
  11. 10.4135/9781412986069
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →