Is It Fake News or Is It Open Science? Science Communication in the COVID-19 Pandemic

Amy Koerber Texas Tech University

Abstract

This article explores science communication in the context of COVID-19 through a case study of a January 31, 2020, bioRxiv preprint publication that led to conspiracy theories by suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 originated in the laboratory through genetic engineering. Analysis will consider the initial preprint, the scientific critique that led it to be withdrawn, the conspiracy theories that continue to circulate, and the larger debate that this example has sparked among advocates and critics of open science.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2021-01-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651920958506
Open Access
OA PDF Bronze
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 6 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30418-9
  2. 10.7208/chicago/9780226099088.001.0001
  3. 10.1080/22221751.2020.1738279
  4. Kupferschmidt K. (2020, February 28). Preprints bring ‘firehose’of outbreak data. Science, 367(6481). https:/…
  5. Pradhan P., Pandey A. K., Mishra A., Gupta P., Tripathi P. K., Menon M. B., Gomes M. J., Vivekanandan P., Kun…
  6. Yao X., Ye F., Zhang M., Cui C., Huang B., Niu P., Liu X., Zhao L., Dong E., Song C., Zhan S., Lu R., Li H., …
CrossRef global citation count: 27 View in citation network →