Don’t Read the Comments: Discourse About COVID-19 Vaccines in a State Health Department's Social Media Comments

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Oct 2025 Open Access

Don’t Read the Comments: Discourse About COVID-19 Vaccines in a State Health Department's Social Media Comments

Daniel Kenzie North Dakota State University ; Murphy Anderson

Abstract

As the United States rolled out COVID-19 vaccinations, state health departments attempted to communicate quickly evolving information about vaccines amid political conflict and misinformation. In October 2021, one state health department shut off comments for their social media to deplatform misinformation. To analyze this health department's Facebook page as a discursive space, our study examines user activity on the page through quantitative analysis of engagement metrics and topical clusters and qualitative analysis of user comments from January to October 2021. Our findings show that the common idea of vaccine proponents valuing data while vaccine skeptics prefer anecdote is not represented; antivaccine comments are pervaded with suspicion toward institutions, while provaccine comments largely use unproductive tactics; the two sides largely showed different sets of concerns; engagement was high during critical moments in the pandemic, and a few top influencers tended to dominate comment threads.

Journal: Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published: 2025-10-01
DOI: 10.1177/00472816241279821
Open Access: OA PDF Hybrid
Topics: social media

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (12)

Lambrecht (2025)

Risk Revisited: The Role of Technical Communication in Negotiating Barriers to …

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Sparby (2025)

A Memetic Pandemic: COVID-19 Memes As Tactical Risk Communication

Technical Communication Quarterly
Campeau (2023)

Who’s a Vaccine Skeptic? Framing Vaccine Hesitancy in Post-Covid News Coverage

Written Communication
Khandelwal et al. (2023)

Typology of Tweets and User Engagement Generated by U.S. Companies Involved in …

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Campeau (2023)

Unofficial Vaccine Advocates: Technical Communication, Localization, and Care b…

Technical Communication Quarterly

Show all 12 →

Campeau (2022)

Vaccination Double Bind: A Study of Pregnancy and COVID-19 Vaccine Decision-Making

Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Bishop et al. (2022)

Tactical Risk Communication: Observations from Teaching and Learning about Cris…

Technical Communication Quarterly
Amidon et al. (2021)

Visual Risk Literacy in “Flatten the Curve” COVID-19 Visualizations

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Bogomoletc et al. (2021)

Frozen Meat Against COVID-19 Misinformation: An Analysis of Steak-Umm and Posit…

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Carlson et al. (2021)

Rural Health and Contextualizing Data

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Graham (2021)

Misinformation Inoculation and Literacy Support Tweetorials on COVID-19

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Koerber (2021)

Is It Fake News or Is It Open Science? Science Communication in the COVID-19 Pandemic

Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Also cites 24 works outside this index ↓

10.3390/vaccines9111279

↗
10.12987/yale/9780300215359.001.0001

↗
10.1080/13669877.2020.1758192

↗
10.14321/jj.7794620.16

↗
10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.09.010

↗
10.1145/3331558.3331561

↗
10.3390/vaccines9040314

↗
10.1371/journal.pone.0248542

↗
10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116197

↗
10.2196/19504

↗
10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.08.064

↗
10.1080/22423982.2021.2021684

↗
10.1353/gpr.2019.0036

↗
10.14321/jj.7794620.8

↗
10.26818/9780814214336

↗
10.1007/s10912-014-9278-4

↗
10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.07.072

↗
10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.10.031

↗
10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.05.023

↗
10.1093/tbm/ibz066

↗
10.7551/mitpress/12436.001.0001

↗
10.1126/science.aap9559

↗
10.14321/jj.7794620.7

↗
10.55177/tc657458

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →