Abstract

As the United States rolled out COVID-19 vaccinations, state health departments attempted to communicate quickly evolving information about vaccines amid political conflict and misinformation. In October 2021, one state health department shut off comments for their social media to deplatform misinformation. To analyze this health department's Facebook page as a discursive space, our study examines user activity on the page through quantitative analysis of engagement metrics and topical clusters and qualitative analysis of user comments from January to October 2021. Our findings show that the common idea of vaccine proponents valuing data while vaccine skeptics prefer anecdote is not represented; antivaccine comments are pervaded with suspicion toward institutions, while provaccine comments largely use unproductive tactics; the two sides largely showed different sets of concerns; engagement was high during critical moments in the pandemic, and a few top influencers tended to dominate comment threads.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
10.1177/00472816241279821
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (41) · 13 in this index

  1. Ten threats to global health in 2019
  2. 10.3390/vaccines9111279
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. 10.12987/yale/9780300215359.001.0001
  5. 10.1080/13669877.2020.1758192
Show all 41 →
  1. From the margins of healthcare: De-mythicizing cancer online
    Peitho: The Journal of the Coalition of Women Scholars in the History of Rhetoric and Composition
  2. 10.14321/jj.7794620.16
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.09.010
  6. Communication Design Quarterly
  7. Bridging experience and expertise: A case study of COVID-19 vaccine trial participation a…
    Rhetoric of Health and Medicine
  8. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  9. Technical Communication Quarterly
  10. Written Communication
  11. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  12. Suspicion: Vaccines, hesitancy, and the affective politics of protection in Barbados
  13. 10.3390/vaccines9040314
  14. 10.1371/journal.pone.0248542
  15. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116197
  16. 10.2196/19504
  17. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  18. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.08.064
  19. 10.1080/22423982.2021.2021684
  20. 10.1353/gpr.2019.0036
  21. 10.14321/jj.7794620.8
  22. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  23. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  24. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  25. 10.26818/9780814214336
  26. 10.1007/s10912-014-9278-4
  27. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.07.072
  28. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.10.031
  29. Why do people share fake news?: A sociotechnical model of media effects
    Georgetown Law Technology Review
  30. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.05.023
  31. 10.1093/tbm/ibz066
  32. 10.7551/mitpress/12436.001.0001
  33. Technical Communication Quarterly
  34. 10.1126/science.aap9559
  35. 10.14321/jj.7794620.7
  36. 10.55177/tc657458