Using Communication Choices as a Boundary-Management Strategy

Cynthia P. Ruppel Nova Southeastern University ; Baiyun Gong Nova Southeastern University ; Leslie C. Tworoger

Abstract

This study examines how members of a global virtual team chose communication media while managing multiple boundaries. The study is unique in that it considers the perspectives of U.S. managers who teleworked from domestic workplaces and virtual team members located in offices in India. It describes the complex dynamics of the decision-making processes that team members used in attempting to allocate their individual resources in order to meet the demands of a high-performance organizational culture. The findings suggest that managers chose media that met task requirements and maintained the boundaries between their work and personal lives rather than media that would provide the most satisfactory experience.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2013-10-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651913490941
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Also cites 43 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.5465/amr.2000.3363315
  2. 10.5465/amr.2004.12736093
  3. 10.4018/irmj.2004100104
  4. 10.1023/B:GRUP.0000021841.01346.35
  5. 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00200.x
  6. 10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
  7. 10.2307/248682
  8. 10.4018/jec.2006070104
  9. 10.1108/09593840610718027
  10. 10.2307/25148857
  11. 10.1287/isre.1070.0167
  12. 10.4337/9781781954331.00019
  13. The matrix organization reloaded: Adventures in team and project management
  14. 10.1509/jimk.9.3.87.19924
  15. 10.1177/1523422307305487
  16. 10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.09.004
  17. 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2009.02.003
  18. 10.1109/TSE.2003.1205177
  19. 10.1177/1523422307305490
  20. 10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.659
  21. 10.17730/humo.68.2.7x4406g270801284
  22. 10.1177/0149206305279113
  23. 10.2307/20159571
  24. 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000612
  25. 10.1108/17410391011088628
  26. 10.1111/j.1468-005X.2008.00219.x
  27. 10.1145/501317.501353
  28. 10.1287/orsc.11.5.473.15200
  29. 10.1109/TPC.2005.843300
  30. 10.1002/acp.1387
  31. 10.7748/nr2003.01.10.2.50.c5888
  32. 10.4018/jec.2010070102
  33. 10.1287/orsc.3.4.475
  34. 10.1109/47.826416
  35. 10.1145/1180875.1180925
  36. 10.1007/BF02512227
  37. 10.1037/0021-9010.79.1.87
  38. 10.1287/isre.10.2.150
  39. 10.1080/03637750500534396
  40. 10.4018/jec.2013040102
  41. 10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872
  42. 10.2307/2393372
  43. 10.1016/S0090-2616(02)00132-8
CrossRef global citation count: 35 View in citation network →