Abstract

The small amount of work on workplace writing assessment has focused almost entirely on student readiness for professional writing or included case studies of employer expectations for new writers. While these studies provide insight into current pedagogies for technical writing and writing instruction in general, the main conclusion to be drawn from them is the unsatisfactory number of recent graduates who display workplace readiness. In this article, we explore writing assessment research in both the academy and the workplace and attempt to identify ways in which the academy’s assessment practices lead, lag behind, or simply differ from writing assessment in the workplace. This comparison will serve to identify not only where the academy might improve pedagogy in its curriculum for technical communication in order to best prepare students for workplace writing but also where the workplace might learn from the academy to improve its own hiring and training procedures for technical writers. In this case study, we used Neff’s approach to grounded theory to categorize rater feedback according to a ranking system and then used statistical analysis to compare writer performance. We found that the direct test method yields the most predictive results when raters combine tacit knowledge with a clearly defined rubric. We hope that the methods used in this study can be replicated in future studies to yield further results when exploring workplace genres and what they might teach us about our own pedagogical practice.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2019-01-01
DOI
10.1177/0047281618784267
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Bronze
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (29) · 12 in this index

  1. Research in the Teaching of English
  2. Beaman, R. (August, 1990). Alternative student assessments in advertising copywriting …
  3. Engaging ideas: The professor’s guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and acti…
  4. Technical Communication
  5. College Composition and Communication
Show all 29 →
  1. Worlds apart: Acting and writing in academic and workplace contexts
  2. Measuring growth in English
  3. College Composition and Communication
  4. Assessment of writing: Politics, policies, practices
  5. Assessing Writing
  6. Assessing Writing
  7. Assessing Writing
  8. Technical Communication
  9. Validating holistic scoring for writing assessment
  10. Theory and practice in the teaching of writing: Rethinking the discipline
  11. 10.1093/applin/amp040
  12. 10.2307/377930
  13. Assessing Writing
  14. 10.2307/j.ctt46nrqf.12
  15. Assessing Writing
  16. Perney, J. (April, 1994). Using writing samples to predict success in a graduate colleg…
  17. Introduction: General writing skills instruction and its discontents. Reconceiving writin…
  18. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2001.tb00660.x
  19. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  20. 10.1002/j.2161-1920.2005.tb00893.x
  21. 10.2190/PL1C6
  22. College Composition and Communication
  23. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  24. Assessing Writing