Toward a Critical Perspective of Culture: Contrast or Compare Rhetorics

Junhua Wang University of Minnesota, Duluth

Abstract

Kaplan's framework of contrastive rhetoric has been widely accepted in the field of cross-cultural technical communication. However, in the last four decades, contextual factors such as economic globalization trend and the advances of communication technologies are changing our ways of interacting with others. As a result our understanding of culture and cultural differences need to be adjusted. In this research, I start by recommending a workable definition of culture in the present context—culture as a process, which establishes a foundation for cross-cultural rhetorical research in the new era when communication across cultures transcends national boundaries. Based on the critical perspective of culture, I continue to point out the limitations of contrastive rhetoric and argue that contrastive rhetoric's view of culture and its research purpose and methodology need to be modified to overcome its constraints and better meet the needs of the present social context.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2008-04-01
DOI
10.2190/tw.38.2.c
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (6)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Show all 6 →
  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
Also cites 15 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1966.tb00804.x
  2. 10.4135/9781452229720.n2
  3. 10.1016/j.jeap.2004.07.002
  4. 10.4324/9781410617002
  5. 10.1177/108056990006300313
  6. 10.2307/3588238
  7. 10.1017/CBO9781139524599
  8. 10.1017/CBO9781139524810.015
  9. 10.2307/3587880
  10. 10.1515/9783110883527.457
  11. 10.2307/3587759
  12. 10.2307/3588050
  13. 10.1080/10570319309374467
  14. 10.1080/00028533.1993.11951559
  15. 10.1080/00335638409383686
CrossRef global citation count: 10 View in citation network →