Technical Documentation and legal Liability

John M. Caher New York Times

Abstract

Litigation rooted in disputes over the interpretation and sufficiency of technical documentation is increasingly common as a number of suits have been filed in state and federal courts. This article describes the matter of Martin v. Hacker (83 NY2nd 1, Nov. 23, 1993), a recent case in which New York's highest court analyzed a technical writer's prose in the context of a lawsuit over a drug-induced suicide.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
1995-01-01
DOI
10.2190/9xpr-qj5l-pul2-lw9j
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

References (6) · 1 in this index

  1. Enterprise Responsibility for Personal Injury
  2. Holzer H. M., Product Liability Law: The Impact on New York Businesses, Brooklyn Law School, 1990.
  3. Technical Writing: Situations and Strategies
  4. Martin Cynthia J., Individually and as Executrix of Eugene J. Martin, Deceased, v. Arthur Hacker, et al., and…
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Show all 6 →
  1. There Ought to Be a Law: Product Liability in New York State, The Public Policy Institute, Special Report, Ju…