Abstract

Technical writing explains and, in contrast to other kinds of writing, insists on the visual. Explanation and visualization are mutually dependent, because explanation combines “description,” the observable facts, and “diagram,” the graphic paradigm of the relations that obtain among these facts. The technical writer's principal task, then, is to make explicit, by using appropriate spatial, temporal, and logical signals, one of three diagrams—schematic, flowchart, tree—that define the basic modes of explanation—object, process, and logical hierarchy. Where the novelist submerges the diagram in metaphoric layers, the technical writer strips them away and surfaces the diagram.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
1984-07-01
DOI
10.2190/8ean-j605-ql07-pech
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

References (24)

  1. A Matrix of Audience Responses For the Internal Proposal, The Technical Writing Teacher, Winter, 1983.
  2. Images of Romanticism
  3. The Technical Writing Teacher
  4. Scientific Explanations
  5. Mind and Nature
Show all 24 →
  1. How to Write Information Mapping
  2. Style: An Anti-Textbook
  3. The Practical Craft: Readings for Business and Technical Writers
  4. The John McPhee Reader
  5. Basin and Range
  6. The Problem of Style
  7. Anatomy of Criticism
  8. Designing Technical Reports
  9. Instruments of Communication
  10. Technical Management and Administration
  11. Sprat T., History of the Royal Society, 1667, quoted by Tilley A.A.
  12. The Cambridge History of English Literature
  13. Wojick D., Treeing the Issues, Water Spectrum, Winter 1975–76.
  14. Hierarchical Structures
  15. A Theory of Discourse
  16. Contemporary Essays on Style
  17. 10.2307/374228
  18. Visual Thinking
  19. Psychological Review