Abstract

This article offers a genealogy of the deliberative policymaking of the WPA Outcomes Statement 3.0 Revision Task Force. Interviews with Task Force members reveal that the revised statement presents composing, technology, and genre as “boundary objects,” in order to preserve the document’s kairos for as long as possible.

Journal
College Composition and Communication
Published
2018-09-01
DOI
10.58680/ccc201829784
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. College Composition and Communication
  2. College Composition and Communication

References (27)

  1. Democracy, Deliberation, and Education
  2. The WPA Outcomes Statement—A Decade Later
  3. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences
  4. Personal interview
  5. The Outcomes Book: Debate and Consensus after the WPA Outcomes Statement
Show all 27 →
  1. The WPA Outcomes Statement: A Decade Later
  2. “WPA Outcomes Statement for First-Year Composition (3.0), Approved July 17, 2014.”
    Council of Writing Program Administrators
  3. Personal interview
  4. “Revising FYC Outcomes for a Multimodal, Digitally Composed World: The WPA Outcomes State…
    Writing Program Administration
  5. 10.1007/s12186-008-9015-0
  6. Diss
  7. The Foucault Reader
  8. A Rhetoric for Writing Program Administrators
  9. Personal interview
  10. Personal interview
  11. The Outcomes Book: Debate and Consensus after the Outcomes Statement
  12. 10.1002/asi.21639.
  13. The Outcomes Book: Debate and Consensus after the WPA Outcomes Statement
  14. Research on Writing: Principles and Methods
  15. The Writing Program Interrupted: Making Space for Critical Discourse
  16. Toward a Composition Made Whole
  17. CSCW: Cooperation or Conflict?
  18. 10.1007/S10676-007-9141-7
  19. Boundary Objects and Beyond: Working with Leigh Star
  20. Sensemaking in Organizations
  21. Very Like a Whale: The Assessment of Writing Programs
  22. Personal interview