Abstract

This article analyzes how public policymakers responded to CCCC’s 1988 National Language Policy. While many treated CCCC as a leading critic of English-only policies, others interpreted the organization to be more of a hesitant critic, or even an outright ally of the English-only movement. Rather than cede rhetorical ground to monolingual ideologies, policies, and movements, I argue for language policies that place less emphasis on English and more on language as a right and a translingual practice.

Journal
College Composition and Communication
Published
2019-09-01
DOI
10.58680/ccc201930293
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Literacy in Composition Studies

References (76) · 18 in this index

  1. Reframing Writing Assessment to Improve Teaching and Learning
  2. CCCC Response to Language Policy Letters
  3. College English
  4. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays
  5. The English-Only Question: An Official Language for Americans?
Show all 76 →
  1. Voices of Modernity: Language Ideologies and the Politics of Inequality
  2. The Rise of Writing: Redefining Mass Literacy
  3. CCCC Response to Language Policy Letters
  4. “All of the Above: New Coalitions in Sociocultural Linguistics.”
    Journal of Sociolinguistics  
  5. Translingual Practice: Global Englishes and Cosmopolitan Relations
  6. CCCC Executive Committee Meetings
  7. “Qaneryaramta Egmiucia: Continuing Our Language.”
    Anthropology & Education Quarterly  
  8. Sociopolitical Perspectives on Language Policy and Planning in the USA
  9. CCCC Response to Language Policy Letters
  10. “Revised National Language Policy.”
    National Council of Teachers of English
  11. College Composition and Communication
  12. Hold Your Tongue: Bilingualism and the Politics of “English Only”
  13. College English
  14. Box 9, Record Series 15/74/3
  15. CCCC Response to Language Policy Letters
  16. “The Unexamined Relationship between Neoliberalism and Plurilingualism: A Cautionary Tale.”
    TESOL Quarterly  
  17. Local Language Policy: Shifting Scales in the English-Only Movement
  18. “Making English Local: Chronotopes in Language Policy Discourse.”
    Journal of Language and Politics  
  19. College Composition and Communication
  20. College English
  21. College Composition and Communication
  22. CCCC Response to Language Policy Letters
  23. CCCC Response to Language Policy Letters
  24. College Composition and Communication
  25. CCCC Response to Language Policy Letters
  26. Reworking Composition: Terms of Exchange
  27. College English
  28. “English Only and U.S. College Composition.”
    College Composition and Communication  
  29. CCCC Response to Language Policy Letters
  30. Redesigning Composition for Multilingual Realities
  31. Language and the Law: Linguistic Inequality in America
  32. College Composition and Communication
  33. Language Policy Committee, Conference on College Composition and Communication, 1987–97
  34. Language Policy Committee, 1987–97, Conference on College Composition and Communication
  35. “Language Knowledge and Awareness Survey Report.”
    Conference on College Composition and Communication
  36. Language Policy Committee, 1987–97, Conference on College Composition and Communication
  37. CCCC Response to Language Policy Letters
  38. College Composition and Communication
  39. Teaching English in the Two-Year College
  40. Language and Minority Rights: Ethnicity, Nationalism, and the Politics of Language
  41. CCCC Response to Language Policy Letters
  42. Language Policy Committee, 1987–97
  43. CCCC Response to Language Policy Letters
  44. English Learners Left Behind: Standardized Testing as Language Policy
  45. “Linguistic Pluralism: A Statement and a Call to Advocacy.”
    Reflections: A Journal of Community-Engaged Writing and Rhetoric
  46. Language as a Local Practice
  47. College Composition and Communication
  48. Language and Politics in the United States and Canada: Myths and Realities
  49. College Composition and Communication
  50. “Orientations in Language Planning.”
    NABE Journal  
  51. CCCC Response to Language Policy Letters
  52. “The Language Policy of State Drivers’ License Testing: Expediency, Symbolism, or Creepin…
    Language Policy  
  53. “Teaching for Agency: From Appreciating Linguistic Diversity to Empowering Student Writers.”
    Composition Studies
  54. College Composition and Communication
  55. CCCC Response to Language Policy Letters
  56. The Tongue-Tied American: Confronting the Foreign Language Crisis
  57. College Composition and Communication
  58. Language Policy Committee, 1987–1997
  59. Not Only English: Affirming America’s Multilingual Heritage
  60. Talkin and Testifyin: The Language of Black America
  61. College English
  62. America’s Second Tongue: American Indian Education and the Ownership of English, 1860–1900
  63. Advisability of a Language Statement for the 1980s and 1990s, 1981–1985
  64. College Composition and Communication
  65. CCCC Response to Language Policy Letters
  66. An Alternate Pragmatism for Going Public
  67. Language without Rights
  68. Shaping Language Policy in the U.S.: The Role of Composition Studies
  69. Discourse Analysis beyond the Speech Event
  70. Cosmopolitan English and Transliteracy
  71. College English