Abstract

Keith Gilyard's contribution offers a bracing response to the symposium and the larger body of work identified with "translingual." Identifying the emergence of translingual perspectives with a long tradition in composition (and beyond) combating monolingualist ideology, he cautions against temptations to turn translingual theory's insistence on difference as the norm of language practice into a flattening of all difference through abstraction that elides the negotiation of differences in power from communicative practice, a removal that would lead to overlooking which differences in language have what effects on whom. Gilyard's response and this symposium as a whole show how "translingualism" can, might, and needs to be always put to work.

Journal
College English
Published
2016-01-01
DOI
10.58680/ce201627660
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (11)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. College English
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. College Composition and Communication
  5. College Composition and Communication
Show all 11 →
  1. College Composition and Communication
  2. Pedagogy
  3. College Composition and Communication
  4. College Composition and Communication
  5. College Composition and Communication
  6. Computers and Composition

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

CrossRef global citation count: 53 View in citation network →