Abstract

Keith Gilyard's contribution offers a bracing response to the symposium and the larger body of work identified with "translingual." Identifying the emergence of translingual perspectives with a long tradition in composition (and beyond) combating monolingualist ideology, he cautions against temptations to turn translingual theory's insistence on difference as the norm of language practice into a flattening of all difference through abstraction that elides the negotiation of differences in power from communicative practice, a removal that would lead to overlooking which differences in language have what effects on whom. Gilyard's response and this symposium as a whole show how "translingualism" can, might, and needs to be always put to work.

Journal
College English
Published
2016-01-01
DOI
10.58680/ce201627660
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (19)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. College English
  3. Reflections: A Journal of Community-Engaged Writing and Rhetoric
  4. Reflections: A Journal of Community-Engaged Writing and Rhetoric
  5. Reflections: A Journal of Community-Engaged Writing and Rhetoric
Show all 19 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. College Composition and Communication
  3. College Composition and Communication
  4. Reflections: A Journal of Community-Engaged Writing and Rhetoric
  5. College Composition and Communication
  6. Pedagogy
  7. College Composition and Communication
  8. Literacy in Composition Studies
  9. Literacy in Composition Studies
  10. College Composition and Communication
  11. College Composition and Communication
  12. Computers and Composition
  13. Communication Design Quarterly
  14. Literacy in Composition Studies

References (0)

No references on file for this article.