Abstract

Arguing against the emphasis of traditional U.S. composition classes on linguistically homogeneous situations, the authors contend that this focus is at odds with actual language use today. They call for a translingual approach, which they define as seeing difference in language not as a barrier to overcome or as a problem to manage, but as a resource for producing meaning in writing, speaking, reading, and listening.

Journal
College English
Published
2011-01-01
DOI
10.58680/ce201113403
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (35)

  1. College Composition and Communication
  2. College English
  3. College English
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Written Communication
Show all 35 →
  1. Research in the Teaching of English
  2. College Composition and Communication
  3. College Composition and Communication
  4. College Composition and Communication
  5. College Composition and Communication
  6. Research in the Teaching of English
  7. Pedagogy
  8. Research in the Teaching of English
  9. Written Communication
  10. College Composition and Communication
  11. Pedagogy
  12. College Composition and Communication
  13. College Composition and Communication
  14. Written Communication
  15. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  16. Pedagogy
  17. Pedagogy
  18. College Composition and Communication
  19. Pedagogy
  20. College Composition and Communication
  21. College Composition and Communication
  22. Computers and Composition
  23. Computers and Composition
  24. Pedagogy
  25. College Composition and Communication
  26. Pedagogy
  27. Pedagogy
  28. Written Communication
  29. Pedagogy
  30. Rhetoric Review

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

CrossRef global citation count: 310 View in citation network →