Abstract

The books under review here envision models of professional development not as episodes of developing skills or training faculty to conform to changing laws, rules, and pet projects of administrators, but rather as collaborative processes of education and reflection that encourage faculty to rethink their practices. They draw on research in composition theory and pedagogy, suggesting that more effective learning takes place when teachers trust learners to consider their own need for knowledge, invite learners to devise variations and applications of received knowledge, and resist keeping things simple to be sure they are correct. Applying different focuses, these books consider how to put teacher-learners at the center of the process of their own professional development. Jeffrey Jablonski argues that the expertise developed in composition studies needs to be recognized and respected in initiatives to implement Cross-Curricular Literacy programs. The writers of The Everyday Writing Center consider how, in the midst of increased professionalization, to maintain the serendipitous—even carnivalesque, at times—learning and teaching that the intimate and nonhierarchical space of a writing center can foster. And the collective wisdom in The Writing Center Director's Resource Book surveys the current state of writing center theory and practice, providing a reflective guide for developing the expertise of writing center administrators, who are (or could be) leaders in campus faculty development efforts.

Journal
Pedagogy
Published
2008-10-01
DOI
10.1215/15314200-2008-010
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (16) · 4 in this index

  1. Anson, Chris M., ed. 2002. The WAC Casebook: Scenes for Faculty Reflection and Program Development. New York:…
  2. Bergmann, Linda S. 1998. “Missionary Projects and Anthropological Accounts: Ethics and Conflict in Writing ac…
  3. ———. 2000. “WAC Meets the Ethos of Engineering: Process, Collaboration, and Disciplinary Practices.” Language…
  4. Bruffee, Kenneth A. 1984. “Peer Tutoring and the `Conversation of Mankind.'” In Writing Centers: Theory and A…
  5. Fulwiler, Toby, and Art Young. 1982. Language Connections: Writing and Reading across the Curriculum. Urbana,…
Show all 16 →
  1. College Composition and Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Jones, Robert, and Joseph J. Comprone. 1993. “Where Do We Go Next in Writing across the Curriculum?” College …
  4. Kail, Harvey. 2003. “Separation, Initiation, and Return: Tutor Training Manuals and Writing Center Lore.” The…
  5. Writing Center Journal
  6. McIntosh, Peggy. 2005. “Unpacking the Invisible Backpack.” In White Privilege: Essential Readings on the Othe…
  7. McLeod, Susan H., and Margot Iris Soven, eds. 2006. Composing a Community: A History of Writing across the Cu…
  8. North, Stephen M. 1984. “The Idea of a Writing Center.” College English46: 433-56.
  9. College Composition and Communication
  10. Russell, David R. 1995. “Activity Theory and Its Implications for Writing Instruction.” In Petraglia 1995: 51-78.
  11. Trimbur, John. 1987. “Peer Tutoring: A Contradiction in Terms?” Writing Center Journal7, no. 2: 21-28.