Computers and Composition Jun 2024

Does the peer review mode make a difference? An exploratory look at undergraduates' performances and preferences in a writing course

Yi-Chin Hsieh Nanyang Technological University ; Alvin Ping Leong Nanyang Technological University ; Yu-Ju Lin Purdue University West Lafayette ; Vahid Aryadoust Nanyang Technological University
Journal
Computers and Composition
Published
2024-06-01
DOI
10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102854
Open Access
Closed
Topics
multimodality revision

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Rojas-Alfaro et al. (2025)
    High-context instruction: A case study of community college student responses f…
    Computers and Composition

Cites in this index (4)

  1. Pritchard et al. (2017)
    Comparison of Online and Face-to-Face Peer Review of Writing
    Computers and Composition
  2. Loretto et al. (2016)
    Secondary Students’ Perceptions of Peer Review of Writing
    Research in the Teaching of English
  3. Bradley (2014)
    Peer-reviewing in an intercultural wiki environment - student interaction and r…
    Computers and Composition
  4. Chang (2012)
    Peer Review via Three Modes in an EFL Writing Course
    Computers and Composition
Also cites 24 works outside this index ↓
  1. Cho (2011)
    Peer reviewers learn from giving comments
    Instructional Science  ↗
  2. Cho (2011)
    Learning by reviewing
    Journal of Educational Psychology  ↗
  3. Cho (2007)
    Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the disciplines: A web-based reciprocal peer review system
    Computers and Education  ↗
  4. Ebadi (2017)
    Exploring the impact of online peer-editing using Google Docs on EFL learners’ academic w…
    Computer Assisted Language Learning  ↗
  5. Handsfield (2009)
    Becoming critical consumers and producers of text: Teaching literacy with Web 1.0 and Web 2.0
    The Reading Teacher  ↗
  6. Ho (2007)
    Face-to-face and computer-mediated peer review in EFL writing
    CALICO Journal  ↗
  7. Hsieh (2022)
    Reconceptualizing the value of peer feedback and instructor feedback using a sequential s…
    Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education  ↗
  8. Jensen (2016)
    Peer-review writing workshops in college courses: Students’ perspectives about online and…
    Social Sciences  ↗
  9. Lam (2013)
    The relationship between assessment types and text revision
    ELT Journal  ↗
  10. Lee (2015)
    Peer feedback in second language writing: Investigating junior secondary students’ perspe…
    System  ↗
  11. Li (2017)
    The role of anonymity in peer assessment
    Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education  ↗
  12. Li (2008)
    Utilizing peer interactions to promote learning through a web-based peer assessment system
    Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology  ↗
  13. Liou (2009)
    Training effects on computer-mediated peer review
    System  ↗
  14. Liu (2003)
    The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing
    Journal of English for Academic Purposes  ↗
  15. McKenna (2020)
    Blended learning: Balancing the best of both worlds for adult learners
    Adult Learning  ↗
  16. Mostert (2013)
    Where angels fear to tread: Online peer assessment in a large first-year class
    Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education  ↗
  17. Nicol (2010)
    From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education
    Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education  ↗
  18. Raes (2015)
    Increasing anonymity in peer assessment by using classroom response technology within fac…
    Studies in Higher Education  ↗
  19. Snowball (2007)
    Using the tutorial system to improve the quality of feedback to students in large class t…
    South African Journal of Higher Education  ↗
  20. Szymkowiak (2021)
    Information technology and Gen Z: The role of teachers, the internet, and technology in t…
    Technology in Society  ↗
  21. Topping (2009)
    Peer assessment
    Theory into Practice  ↗
  22. Tsui (2000)
    Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments?
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
  23. Van Zundert (2010)
    Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions
    Learning and Instruction  ↗
  24. Zheng (2015)
    Middle school students’ writing and feedback in a cloud-based classroom environment
    Technology, Knowledge and Learning  ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 6 View in citation network →

Related Articles

  1. Written Communication Feb 2026
    Reading Medium and Communicative Purpose in Writing: Effects on Pausing Behaviour and Text Quality, Controlling for Reading Comprehension and Executive Functions ↗
    Ángel Valenzuela; Cristian A. Rojas-Barahona; Ramón D. Castillo; Ladislao Salmerón
    assessment curriculum design multimodality multilingual writers revision
  2. Written Communication Jan 2026
    The Contributions of Student-Level and Classroom-Level Factors for Australian Grade 2 Students’ Writing Performance ↗
    Anabela Malpique; Mustafa Asil; Deborah Pino-Pasternak; Debora Valcan
    multimodality multilingual writers revision
  3. College Composition and Communication Jun 2025
    Using Eye Tracking as a Peer Review Tool for Visual and Digital Compositions ↗
    Kathryn Lambrecht
    multimodality multilingual writers revision
  4. Written Communication Jan 2025
    Self-Regulated Strategy Development With and Without Peer Interaction: Improving High School Students’ L2 Persuasive Essay Revisions ↗
    Albert W. Li
    quantitative research multimodality revision
  5. Rhetoric & Public Affairs Jun 2024
    Queer Rhetorical Leadership: “Ethical Sluts” in Modern U.S.-American Polyamory as Exemplar ↗
    Thomas R. Dunn
    multimodality gender and writing multilingual writers revision