Abstract
Fully anonymous peer review enhances students’ writing and feedback abilities, encourages professionalism and kindness, and transforms the teaching dynamic. This essay describes the use of the Peerceptiv platform for fully anonymous peer review assignments in law school courses. This platform is uniquely helpful in fostering professional identity formation while helping students improve their analytical writing skills. However, implementing this peer review platform comes with challenges such as student reluctance and discomfort. With strategic communication and investment of time, these challenges can be overcome to realize the potential of this innovative approach and provide formative assessment, regardless of class size. Ultimately, scalable peer review helps students strengthen skills while developing collaborative professional identities throughout the law school curriculum.
- Journal
- Prompt: A Journal of Academic Writing Assignments
- Published
- 2024-07-16
- DOI
- 10.31719/pjaw.v8i2.184
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Topics
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
Cites in this index (0)
No references match articles in this index.
Related Articles
-
Assessing Writing Apr 2026Zaibo Long; Jinfen Xu
-
Assessing Writing Apr 2026Xinyu Ma; Cong Zhang; Icy Lee
-
Written Communication Feb 2026Reading Medium and Communicative Purpose in Writing: Effects on Pausing Behaviour and Text Quality, Controlling for Reading Comprehension and Executive Functions ↗Ángel Valenzuela; Cristian A. Rojas-Barahona; Ramón D. Castillo; Ladislao Salmerón
-
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Feb 2026Heidi Schultz
-
Technical Communication Quarterly Jan 2026Joe Schicke