Abstract

Faculty actions in the classroom are known to impact student writing self-efficacy and academic achievement. The purpose of this paper was to validate Locke and Johnston’s Individual and Collective Self-Efficacy for Teaching Writing Scales, a tool originally validated in high school teachers, in a new population of post-secondary faculty. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis methods were used in two studies with independent samples of multidisciplinary faculty (N = 281) for the exploratory factor analysis (Study 1) and nursing discipline specific faculty (N = 187) for the confirmatory factor analysis (Study 2). Three factors were identified in the questionnaire which maintained the essence of the theoretical structure proposed by Locke and Johnston. Factor 1 was named Context and Process Competencies, Factor 2 Textural Competencies, and Factor 3 Motivational Competencies. This factor structure was confirmed with acceptable goodness of fit in the confirmatory factor analysis Study 2. Learning to be a teacher of writing is a developmental process and this measurement tool has important validation information that speaks to its usefulness in understanding that process. • Instructional practices are known to impact student achievement levels. • Faculty individual self-efficacy for teaching writing is three factors. • Faculty undergo a slow enculturation practice to teaching writing. • This scale can be used to assess impact of teacher agency on student outcomes.

Journal
Assessing Writing
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
10.1016/j.asw.2025.100923
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (17) · 1 in this index

  1. Crossing thresholds: What’s to know about writing across the curriculum
    Naming what we know: Threshold concepts of writing studies
  2. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
  3. Reflecting on the past, reconstructing the future: Faculty members’ threshold concepts fo…
    Across the Disciplines
  4. Latent variable modeling using R: A step-by-step guide
  5. Examining college writing readiness
    The Educational Forum  
Show all 17 →
  1. Exploratory factor analysis: Current use, methodological developments and recommendations…
    Current Psychology  
  2. Assessing Writing
  3. Individual and collective self-efficacy for teaching writing in a multidisciplinary sampl…
    Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie
  4. Individual and collective self-efficacy for teaching writing
    Harvard Dataverse
  5. Development and validation of the situated academic writing self-efficacy scale (SAWSES)
    Assessing Writing
  6. Writing self-efficacy in postsecondary students: A scoping review
    Educational Psychology Review  
  7. The importance of the assumption of uncorrelated errors in psychometric theory
    Educational Psychology Measurement  
  8. Revelle, W. (2023). Package ‘psych’. June 21, 〈https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/psych/psych.pdf〉.
  9. Rosseel, Y., Jorgensen, T.D., Oberski, D., Byrnes, J., Vanbrabant, L., Savalei, V., Merkle, E., Hallquist, M.…
  10. What community college instructors think about student writing: Results of a national sur…
    College Teaching
  11. The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers
    Teaching and Teacher Education  
  12. Faculty views on the importance of writing, the nature of academic writing, and teaching …
    Journal of Second Language Writing