Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (7)

1. Kushki et al. (2022)
   Dynamic assessment of argumentative writing: Mediating task response
   Assessing Writing
2. Peterson et al. (2021)
   Young children’s written and verbal responses in a dynamic assessment context
   Assessing Writing
3. Poe et al. (2019)
   Evidence of fairness: Twenty-five years of research in Assessing Writing
   Assessing Writing
4. Shrestha et al. (2012)
   Dynamic assessment, tutor mediation and academic writing development
   Assessing Writing
5. WIJK et al. (1999)
   Identifying Writing Strategies Through Text Analysis
   Written Communication

Show all 7 →

1. Flower et al. (1980)
   The Cognition of Discovery: Defining a Rhetorical Problem
   College Composition and Communication
2. Flower et al. (1977)
   Problem-Solving Strategies and the Writing Process
   College English

Also cites 26 works outside this index ↓

1. Aljaafreh (1994)
   Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal deve…
   The Modern Language Journal  ↗
2. Antón (2009)
   Dynamic Assessment of Advanced Second Language Learners
   Foreign Language Annals  ↗
3. Barkaoui (2019)
   What can L2 writers’ pausing behavior tell us about their L2 writing processes?
   Studies in Second Language Acquisition  ↗
4. Brown, G., Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge University Press.
    ↗
5. Connor (2002)
   Discourse approaches to writing assessment
   Annual Review of Applied Linguistics  ↗
6. Cronbach (1955)
   Construct validity in psychological tests
   Psychological Bulletin  ↗
7. Cumming, A., Kantor, R., Baba, K., Eouanzoui, U. & James, M. (2006). Analysis of discourse features and verif…
    ↗
8. Gal'perin (1989)
   Organization of mental activity and the effectiveness of learning
   Soviet Psychology  ↗
9. Hadidi (2021)
   Application of a SCOBA in educational praxis of L2 written argumentative discourse
   Language and Sociocultural Theory  ↗
10. Kane (2010)
    Validity and fairness
    Language Testing  ↗
11. Kane (1992)
    An argument-based approach to validity
    Psychological Bulletin  ↗
12. Lantolf (2004)
    Dynamic assessment: Bringing the past into the future
    Journal of Applied Linguistics  ↗
13. Lantolf (2010)
    Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for second language development
    Language Teaching Research  ↗
14. Lantolf (2013)
    The unfairness of equal treatment: Objectivity in L2 testing and dynamic assessment
    Educational Research and Evaluation  ↗
15. Moss (1992)
    Shifting conceptions of validity in educational measurement: Implications for performance…
    Review of Educational Research  ↗
16. Moss (2003)
    Reconceptualizing validity for classroom assessment
    Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice  ↗
17. Nassaji (2000)
    A Vygotskian perspective on corrective feedback in L2: The effect of random versus negoti…
    Language Awareness  ↗
18. Nassaji (2021)
    The differential diagnostic affordances of interventionist and interactionist dynamic ass…
    Language and Sociocultural Theory  ↗
19. Packer, M.J., & Cole, M. (2022). The challenges to the study of cultural variation in cognition. Review of Ph…
     ↗
20. Poehner (2007)
    Beyond the test: L2 dynamic assessment and the transcendence of mediated learning
    Modern Language Journal  ↗
21. Poehner (2011)
    Validity and interaction in the ZPD: Interpreting learner development through L2 Dynamic …
    International Journal of Applied Linguistics  ↗
22. Poehner (2021)
    Dynamic Assessment and second language development
    Language Teaching  ↗
23. Rahimi (2015)
    Diagnostic and developmental potentials of dynamic assessment for L2 writing
    Language and Sociocultural Theory  ↗
24. Scardamalia (1984)
    Teachability of reflective processes in written composition
    Cognitive Science  ↗
25. Siegler (1991)
    The microgenetic method: A direct means for studying cognitive development
    American Psychologist  ↗
26. Toulmin, S.E. (1958/2003). The Uses of Arguments. Cambridge University Press.
     ↗