Assessing Writing Jan 2018

Effects of indirect coded corrective feedback with and without short affective teacher comments on L2 writing performance, learner uptake and motivation

Chiachieh Tang National Taiwan Normal University ; Yeu-Ting Liu
Journal
Assessing Writing
Published
2018-01-01
DOI
10.1016/j.asw.2017.12.002
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
genre theory teacher development multilingual writers editorial matter
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (9)

  1. Matthews et al. (2025)
    Praise Proficiency: Unraveling Student Perceptions of Praise Types in an ESL Cl…
    Writing and Pedagogy
  2. Alharthi (2025)
    Examining EFL learners’ quantity and quality of uptake of teacher corrective fe…
    Assessing Writing
  3. Cen et al. (2024)
    The motivational aspect of feedback: A meta-analysis on the effect of different…
    Assessing Writing
  4. Cui et al. (2023)
    Developing EFL teachers’ feedback literacy for research and publication purpose…
    Assessing Writing
  5. Zarrinabadi et al. (2023)
    Your writing could have been better: Examining the effects of upward and downwa…
    Assessing Writing
Show all 9 →
  1. Yao et al. (2021)
    Perceptions of the inclusion of Automatic Writing Evaluation in peer assessment…
    Assessing Writing
  2. Mao et al. (2020)
    Feedback scope in written corrective feedback: Analysis of empirical research i…
    Assessing Writing
  3. Yu et al. (2020)
    Investigating what feedback practices contribute to students’ writing motivatio…
    Assessing Writing
  4. Zheng et al. (2019)
    What has been assessed in writing and how? Empirical evidence from Assessing Wr…
    Assessing Writing

References (29) · 2 in this index

  1. Afshin (2011)
    Effectiveness of different types of direct corrective feedback on correct use of English …
    European Journal of Social Sciences
  2. Aliakbari (2009)
    On the effects of error correction strategies on the grammatical accuracy of Iranian Engl…
    Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics
  3. Alraimi (2014)
    Understanding the MOOCs continuance. The role of openness and reputation
    Computers and Education  ↗
  4. Baleghizadeh (2011)
    The effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback on spelling errors
    Profile
  5. Bitchener (2010)
    Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 learners with written corrective feedback
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
Show all 29 →
  1. Brown (2007)
    Teaching by principles: an interactive approach to language pedagogy
  2. Bruton (2009)
    Designing research into the effects of grammar correction in L2 writing. Not so straightforward
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
  3. Cho et al. (2006)
    Commenting on Writing: Typology and Perceived Helpfulness of Comments from Novi…
    Written Communication
  4. Diab (2015)
    Effectiveness of written corrective feedback: Does type of error and type of co…
    Assessing Writing
  5. Ferris (1999)
    The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes a response to Truscott (1996)
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
  6. Ferris (2001)
    Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be?
    Journal of second language writing  ↗
  7. Goh (2017)
    Research into practice. Scaffolding learning processes to improve speaking performance
    Language Teaching  ↗
  8. Hamidun (2012)
    Enhancing students’ motivation by providing feedback on writing: The case of internationa…
    International Journal of Social Science and Humanity
  9. Li (2010)
    The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis
    Language Learning  ↗
  10. Limayem (2008)
    Understanding information systems continuance: The case of internet-based learning technologies
    Information & Management  ↗
  11. Lyster (2013)
    Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms
    Language Teaching  ↗
  12. Maleki (2013)
    The effects of written corrective feedback techniques on EFL students’ control over gramm…
    Theory and Practice in Language Studies  ↗
  13. Park (2016)
    To what extent do learners benefit from indirect written corrective feedback? A study tar…
    Language Teaching Research  ↗
  14. Robb (1986)
    Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality
    TESOL Quarterly  ↗
  15. Sešek (2016)
    Revising and metadiscourse in advance EFL/ESL writing
    International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature
  16. Sheen (2007)
    The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ …
    TESOL Quarterly  ↗
  17. Shintani (2016)
    The effectiveness of synchronous and asynchronous written corrective feedback on grammati…
    The Mondern Language Journal  ↗
  18. Srichanyachon (2012)
    Teacher written feedback for L2 learners’ writing development
    Silpakorn University Journal of Social Sciences, Humanities and Arts
  19. Storch (2005)
    Collaborative writing: Product, process and students’ reflection
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
  20. Tootkaboni (2014)
    The efficacy of various kinds of feedback on improving writing accuracy of EFL learners
    Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature  ↗
  21. Truscott (2008)
    Error correction, revision, and learning
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
  22. Truscott (1996)
    The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes
    Language Learning  ↗
  23. Underwood (2006)
    Improving student writing through effective feedback. Best practices and recommendations
    Journal of Teaching Writing
  24. Van Beuningen (2012)
    Evidence on the effectiveness of comprehensive error correction in second language writing
    Language Learning  ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 41 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Pedagogy Jan 2026
    Contributors ↗
    rhetorical criticism genre theory writing pedagogy graduate education two-year college teacher development social media race and writing gender and writing affect and writing literary studies editorial matter
  2. Pedagogy Oct 2025
    Contributors ↗
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory cultural rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy advanced composition creative writing writing across the curriculum graduate education two-year college service learning teacher development technical communication professional writing labor and working conditions archival research multimodality artificial intelligence literacy studies race and writing gender and writing disability studies literary studies editorial matter
  3. The Peer Review Sep 2025
    Moving Against the Grain: Combining Writing Center Theory and In-House Editing Services to Create a Graduate Writing Center ↗
    Brian Harrell; Brook Wyers; Craig Theissen
    rhetorical criticism composition theory writing pedagogy graduate education teacher development collaborative writing writing centers peer tutoring professional writing labor and working conditions online writing instruction multilingual writers grammar and mechanics editorial matter
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly Oct 2024
    Editors’ Use of Comprehensive Style Guides: The Case of Singular They ↗
    Jo Mackiewicz; Shaya Kraut; Allison Durazzi
    rhetorical criticism discourse analysis first-year composition writing pedagogy graduate education teacher development writing centers technical communication professional writing digital rhetoric multilingual writers grammar and mechanics literacy studies race and writing public rhetoric editorial matter
  5. Pedagogy Oct 2024
    Contributors ↗
    rhetorical criticism first-year composition writing pedagogy basic writing writing across the curriculum graduate education two-year college service learning teacher development revision argument collaborative writing assessment writing program administration multimodality multilingual writers literacy studies race and writing disability studies community literacy editorial matter