Cited by in this index (11)

1. Yang et al. (2025)
   Linguistic predictors of L2 writing performance: Variations across genres
   Assessing Writing
2. Oğuz (2025)
   Can generative AI figure out figurative language? The influence of idioms on es…
   Assessing Writing
3. Wilson et al. (2024)
   Validity of automated essay scores for elementary-age English language learners…
   Assessing Writing
4. Vo et al. (2023)
   Human scoring versus automated scoring for english learners in a statewide evid…
   Assessing Writing
5. Zheng et al. (2019)
   What has been assessed in writing and how? Empirical evidence from Assessing Wr…
   Assessing Writing

Show all 11 →

1. Xie (2015)
   “I must impress the raters!” An investigation of Chinese test-takers’ strategie…
   Assessing Writing
2. McNamara et al. (2015)
   A hierarchical classification approach to automated essay scoring
   Assessing Writing
3. Shermis (2014)
   State-of-the-art automated essay scoring: Competition, results, and future dire…
   Assessing Writing
4. Ramineni (2013)
   Validating automated essay scoring for online writing placement
   Assessing Writing
5. Klobucar et al. (2013)
   Automated scoring in context: Rapid assessment for placed students
   Assessing Writing
6. Condon (2013)
   Large-scale assessment, locally-developed measures, and automated scoring of es…
   Assessing Writing

Cites in this index (7)

1. Deane (2013)
   On the relation between automated essay scoring and modern views of the writing…
   Assessing Writing
2. Ramineni (2013)
   Validating automated essay scoring for online writing placement
   Assessing Writing
3. Wiseman (2012)
   Rater effects: Ego engagement in rater decision-making
   Assessing Writing
4. Hamp-Lyons (2007)
   Worrying about rating
   Assessing Writing
5. Herrington et al. (2001)
   What Happens When Machines Read Our Students' Writing?
   College English

Show all 7 →

1. Weigle (1999)
   Investigating rater/prompt interactions in writing assessment: Quantitative and…
   Assessing Writing
2. WOLFE et al. (1998)
   Cognitive Differences in Proficient and Nonproficient Essay Scorers
   Written Communication

Also cites 22 works outside this index ↓

1. Bennett (1998)
   Validity and automated scoring: It's not only the scoring
   Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice  ↗
2. Braun (1988)
   Understanding scoring reliability: Experiments in calibrating essay readers
   Journal of Educational Statistics  ↗
3. Bridgeman (2012)
   Comparison of human and machine scoring of essays: Differences by gender, ethnicity, and …
   Applied Measurement in Education  ↗
4. Cheville (2004)
   Automated scoring technologies and the rising influence of error
   English Journal  ↗
5. Clauser (2002)
   Validity issues for performance-based tests scored with computer-automated scoring systems
   Applied Measurement in Education  ↗
6. Cumming (2002)
   Decision-making while rating ESL/EFL writing tasks: A descriptive framework
   Modern Language Journal  ↗
7. Fleiss (1973)
   The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures …
   Educational and Psychological Measurement  ↗
8. Hales (1975)
   The effect of the quality of preceding responses on the grades assigned to subsequent res…
   Journal of Educational Measurement  ↗
9. Hughes (1984)
   The use of model essays to reduce context effects in essay scoring
   Journal of Educational Measurement  ↗
10. Leacock (2003)
    C-rater: Scoring of short-answer questions
    Computers and the Humanities  ↗
11. Leckie (2011)
    Rater effects on essay scoring: A multilevel analysis of severity drift, central tendency…
    Journal of Educational Measurement  ↗
12. Lunz (1990)
    Measuring the impact of judge severity on examination scores
    Applied Measurement in Education  ↗
13. Page (1968)
    The use of the computer in analyzing student essays
    International Review of Education  ↗
14. Powers (2002)
    Comparing the validity of automated and human scoring of essays
    Educational Computing Research  ↗
15. Powers (2002)
    Stumping e-rater: Challenging the validity of automated essay scoring
    Computers in Human Behavior  ↗
16. Saal (1980)
    Rating the ratings: Assessing the psychometric quality of rating data
    Psychological Bulletin  ↗
17. Shermis (2008)
    How important is content in the ratings of essay assessments?
    Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice  ↗
18. Valenti (2003)
    An overview of current research on automated essay grading
    Journal of Information Technology Education  ↗
19. Warschauer (2006)
    Automated writing evaluation: Defining the classroom research agenda
    Language Teaching Research  ↗
20. Williamson (1999)
    ’Mental model’ comparison of automated and human scoring
    Journal of Educational Measurement  ↗
21. Williamson (2012)
    A framework for evaluation and use of automated scoring
    Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices  ↗
22. Yang (2002)
    A review of strategies for validating computer-automated scoring
    Applied Measurement in Education  ↗