Assessing Writing Jan 2010

Can machine scoring deal with broad and open writing tests as well as human readers?

Doug McCurry Australian Council for Educational Research
Journal
Assessing Writing
Published
2010-01-01
DOI
10.1016/j.asw.2010.04.002
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Lim et al. (2019)
    Teaching Writing with Language Feedback Technology
    Computers and Composition
  2. Rakedzon et al. (2017)
    To make a long story short: A rubric for assessing graduate students’ academic …
    Assessing Writing
  3. Shermis (2014)
    State-of-the-art automated essay scoring: Competition, results, and future dire…
    Assessing Writing

References (8)

  1. Bennett, R. E. (2006). Technology and writing assessment: lessons learned from the US national assessment of …
  2. Bennett, R. E., & Ben-Simon, A. (2005). Toward theoretically meaningful automated essay scoring. Retrieved Au…
  3. Burstein, J., & Chodorow, M. Automated essay scoring for nonnative English speakers. Retrieved March 15, 2010…
  4. Elliot (2003)
    Intellimetric: From here to validity
    Automated essay scoring: A cross-disciplinary perspective
  5. Greenberg (1985)
    Writing assessment test design: Response to two WPA essays
    WPA: Writing Programme Administration
Show all 8 →
  1. Huot (1996)
    Toward a new theory of writing assessment
    College Composition and Communication  ↗
  2. Keith (2003)
    Validity of automated essay scoring systems
    Automated essay scoring: A cross-disciplinary perspective
  3. Sandene, B., Horkay, N., Bennett, R. E., Allen, N., Braswell, J., Kaplan, B., et al. (Eds.) (2005). Online As…
CrossRef global citation count: 20 View in citation network → Build reading path →