Abstract

Business communication faculty who invite students to critically engage with issues of sustainability must consider students’ developmental readiness to do so, as these invitations can often seem uninvited. To promote students’ readiness for critical inquiry, faculty should adopt a developmental approach that attends to both cognitive and emotional aspects of learning. This article outlines three ways to frame critical discussions of sustainability: as a new conception of wealth, as a cultural way of knowing, and as an intergenerational social contract. To help faculty develop students’ capacity to engage critically, this article includes guided questions to support critical inquiry and a supplemental reading list.

Journal
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Published
2022-03-01
DOI
10.1177/23294906221074317
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  3. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  4. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Also cites 31 works outside this index ↓
  1. Fox M.J.V., Erickson J. D. (2018). Genuine economic progress in the United States: A fifty state study and co…
  2. Kashima Y. (2020). Cultural dynamics for sustainability: How can humanity craft cultures of sustainability? C…
  3. Li L. M. W., Mei D., Li W.Q., Lee H. (2020). The relationship between dialectical beliefs and proenvironmenta…
  4. Miska C., Szőcs I., Schiffinger M. (2018). Culture’s effects on corporate sustainability practices: A multi-d…
  5. Kohli N., Chawla S. K., Banerjee A., Srinete T. P. (2020). Ageing in developing societies: Issues and challen…
  6. Kudrin A., Gurvich E. (2012). The Russian is Старение населения и угроза бюджетного кризиса [Population aging…
  7. Burns H. L. (2015). Transformative sustainability pedagogy: Learning from ecological systems and indigenous w…
  8. Dean T. J., Pacheco D. F. (2014). Green marketing: A strategic balancing act for creating value. Journal of B…
  9. 10.1177/1080569912458966
  10. Gentner D. (2002). Mental models, psychology of. In Smelser N. J., Bates P. B. (Eds.), International encyclop…
  11. Giacalone R. A., Wargo D. T. (2009). The roots of the global financial crisis are in our business schools. Jo…
  12. 10.4159/9780674038479
  13. 10.1017/CBO9780511816772.016
  14. 10.1177/108056999906200102
  15. Kolb M., Fröhlich L., Schmidpeter R. (2017). Implementing sustainability as the new normal: Responsible manag…
  16. Kreuter M. W., De Rosa C., Howze E. H., Baldwin G. T. (2004). Understanding wicked problems: A key to advanci…
  17. Kubiszewski I., Costanza R., Franco C., Lawn P., Talberth J., Jackson T., Aylmer C. (2013). Beyond GDP: Measu…
  18. Lyon T. P., Montgomery A. W. (2015). The means and end of greenwashing. Organization & Environment, 28(2), 22…
  19. Mabry S. (2011). Tackling the sustainability dilemma: A holistic approach to preparing students for the profe…
  20. Markman A. B., Gentner D. (2001). Thinking. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 223-247. https://doi.org/10.1146…
  21. Mensah J. (2019). Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human …
  22. Park O.C., Gittelman S. S. (1995). Dynamic characteristics of mental models and dynamic visual displays. Inst…
  23. Riley M. W., Riley J. W. (1994). Age integration and the lives of older people. The Gerontologist, 34(1), 110…
  24. Riley M. W., Riley J. W. (2000). Age integration: Conceptual and historical background. The Gerontologist, 40…
  25. Rittel H. W. J., Webber M. W. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155-16…
  26. 10.1177/1080569912460400
  27. 10.1177/1080569909349524
  28. 10.1177/1080569912471187
  29. Vogt M., Weber C. (2019). Current challenges to the concept of sustainability. Global Sustainability, 2(e4), …
  30. 10.1177/108056990206500406
  31. 10.1177/108056999906200404
CrossRef global citation count: 5 View in citation network →