Abstract

This article investigates student behaviour on collaborative assignments, looking at the relationship between task type and interaction, and considers the implications for task design. Students reported on interactions in a year-long workplace-focussed group communication project, comparing these with interactions on other academy-based group assignments. Differences were seen in the amount of brainstorming, the criteria for dividing up work, the intensity of editing, and how conflict was managed. Contributing factors to these differences included the presence or absence of a creative element, the instrumental nature of the task, and the need for a collective approach inherent in the task design.

Journal
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Published
2014-06-01
DOI
10.1177/2329490613514598
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (7)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 7 →
  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Written Communication
Also cites 21 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1177/105256299902300302
  2. 10.1016/j.esp.2009.11.001
  3. 10.5465/amle.2004.12436817
  4. 10.1177/1080569910395563
  5. 10.1108/13563280410534339
  6. 10.1177/1080569908325861
  7. 10.1016/j.esp.2005.10.002
  8. 10.1177/1080569908325860
  9. 10.3200/JOEB.82.1.11-19
  10. 10.1177/1080569908325863
  11. 10.1177/0021943603259363
  12. 10.1177/108056999906200312
  13. 10.1109/TPC.2003.819642
  14. 10.1108/13527599610105484
  15. 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.008
  16. 10.1177/1080569908330373
  17. 10.1177/1080569908325859
  18. 10.1177/1080569908330372
  19. 10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002
  20. 10.1108/13527590210433384
  21. 10.1109/47.946462
CrossRef global citation count: 19 View in citation network →