Ann N. Amicucci

7 articles
University of Colorado Colorado Springs ORCID: 0000-0001-8934-4587

Loading profile…

Publication Timeline

Co-Author Network

Research Topics

Who Reads Amicucci

Ann N. Amicucci's work travels primarily in Digital & Multimodal (60% of indexed citations) · 15 total indexed citations from 4 clusters.

By cluster

  • Digital & Multimodal — 9
  • Technical Communication — 2
  • Rhetoric — 2
  • Composition & Writing Studies — 2

Counts include only citations from indexed journals that deposit reference lists with CrossRef. Authors whose readers publish primarily in venues without reference deposits will appear less central than they are. See coverage notes →

  1. Making Cultural Betweenness Visible: Future English Teachers’ Reflections on Nepantla Identity
    doi:10.58680/ce2025874434
  2. From “Text-heavy slides” to “That image did a lot of the work”: Five faculty transition from text to visuals in online video instruction
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2025.102917
  3. Trivialization and Disembodiment of the Black Lives Matter Movement through the Hashtag #BlackLinesMatter
    Abstract

    Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes1 I am grateful to RR reviewers Brandee Easter and Bridget Gelms for their help and guidance in the revision process and to Erin Johns Speese for her invaluable feedback throughout my work on this manuscript.

    doi:10.1080/07350198.2022.2148235
  4. Experimenting with Writing Identities on Facebook through Intertextuality and Interdiscursivity
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2020.102545
  5. Knowing Students and Hearing Their Voices in Writing: Reconciling Teachers’ Stated Definitions of Voice with Their Response Practices
    Abstract

    For decades, scholars have considered the construct of voice in student writing, and although defining the term remains difficult (see Jeffery; Tardy, Current ; Yancey), the metaphor of voice is still useful and popular in discussions about student writing (see Bryant; Elbow, Voice ). In this article, we first explore the field’s use of the term “voice” as describing writers’ subject positions within the texts and contexts in which they compose. In doing so, we represent the tensions that prior work has identified within the construct of voice. While prior empirical work explored faculty members’ identification of student writers’ voice, it has not used writing by faculty members’ own students. We then report on our study, which was designed to elicit two teachers’ identification of their own students’ voice in their writing. Findings suggest that instructors’ knowledge about their students and classroom contexts contributed to their understanding of voice in their students’ papers. The piece concludes with implications for how teachers can bring critical discussions of voice into the classroom and use our study results to inform their teaching students to attend to ideas of voice in writing.

  6. Rhetorical Choices in Facebook Discourse: Constructing Voice and Persona
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2017.03.006
  7. Feature: Responding with the Golden Rule: A Cross-Institutional Peer Review Experiment
    Abstract

    Instructors recount the challenges and successes that accompanied a collaborative peer review project between first-year college students at two institutions.

    doi:10.58680/tetyc201426089