IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Jun 2018 Open Access

Users’ Personal Conceptions of Usability and User Experience of Electronic and Software Products

Tim R. Haaksma University of Twente ; Menno D. T. de Jong ; Joyce Karreman University of Twente

Abstract

Research problem: Despite the abundance of research into usability and user experience (UX), there is still debate about the relationship between both concepts. The user perspective is under represented in all discussions. This study examines the personal conceptions that users of electronic and software products have of usability and UX. Research questions: 1. How do users of electronic and software products conceptualize usability and UX? 2. What do they think is the relationship between both concepts? Literature review: We review the literature on conceptualizations of usability and UX and their relationship. The literature suggests that both concepts are still developing and that there are different views about their relationship. A personal-constructs research approach appears to be a fruitful way of shedding more light on this. Methodology: Twenty-one participants were asked to place up to eight products in a grid with two axes: usability (high-low) and UX (high-low). They then filled out a short questionnaire about the products. Finally, interviews were held about their decisions and their views on usability and UX. Results and conclusions: A weak positive correlation between products' usability and UX scores indicates that the relationship between both concepts is far from straightforward. An analysis of the four quadrants of the grid provides a first typology of products based on how users perceive their usability and UX. When reflecting on the relationship between the two concepts, most participants see usability as a part of or contributing to UX. Based on our findings, however, it seems risky to assume that usability is sufficiently covered by the overall concept of UX.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2018-06-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2018.2795398
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Green
Topics
argument technical communication book reviews
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Shivener et al. (2025)
    Capturing the Experiences of Simulated Writing for Novice Virtual Reality Users
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. Nizamani et al. (2022)
    Heuristic Evaluation Versus Guideline Reviews: A Tale of Comparing Two Domain U…
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

Cites in this index (9)

  1. Loorbach et al. (2013)
    Verification Steps and Personal Stories in an Instruction Manual for Seniors: E…
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. Wirtz et al. (2013)
    Improving User Experience for Passenger Information Systems. Prototypes and Ref…
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. Elling et al. (2012)
    Combining Concurrent Think-Aloud Protocols and Eye-Tracking Observations: An An…
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. Cleary et al. (2012)
    Preparing Technical Communication Students to Function as User Advocates in a S…
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Redish (2010)
    Technical Communication and Usability: Intertwined Strands and Mutual Influences
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Show all 9 →
  1. Johnson et al. (2007)
    User-Centered Technology in Participatory Culture: Two Decades “Beyond a Narrow…
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. Jong et al. (2000)
    Toward a document evaluation methodology: what does research tell us about the …
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. Schulz et al. (1997)
    Discovering user-generated metaphors through usability testing
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. Mirel (1991)
    Critical review of experimental research on the usability of hard copy documentation
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Also cites 24 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1016/S0953-5438(00)00031-X
     ↗
  2. 10.1007/978-3-319-20901-2_21
     ↗
  3. 10.1145/1518701.1518813
     ↗
  4. 10.1145/1512714.1512717
     ↗
  5. 10.1080/01449290500330331
     ↗
  6. 10.1007/978-3-642-02806-9_2
     ↗
  7. 10.1080/10447318.2015.1065696
     ↗
  8. 10.1145/944519.944525
     ↗
  9. 10.1145/235008.235010
     ↗
  10. 10.1080/10447318.2011.555306
     ↗
  11. 10.1145/175276.175282
     ↗
  12. 10.1007/978-3-319-41627-4_27
     ↗
  13. 10.1080/0144929X.2010.503352
     ↗
  14. 10.1080/10447318.2014.930311
     ↗
  15. 10.1016/j.destud.2013.10.001
     ↗
  16. 10.1016/j.intcom.2009.04.007
     ↗
  17. 10.1145/1013115.1013152
     ↗
  18. 10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.048
     ↗
  19. 10.1080/01449290500331156
     ↗
  20. 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2013.09.006
     ↗
  21. 10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<::AID-ASI1039>3.0.CO;2-O
     ↗
  22. 10.1007/978-3-642-40480-1_31
     ↗
  23. 10.1007/978-3-540-73105-4_19
     ↗
  24. 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2011.08.001
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 18 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Dec 2023
    The State of UX Pedagogy ↗
    Philip B. Gallagher; Guiseppe Getto
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism discourse analysis writing pedagogy teacher development argument assessment technical communication book reviews
  2. Communication Design Quarterly Dec 2022
    Review of "Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things by Jane Bennett," Bennett, J. (2010). <i>Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things.</i> Duke University Press. ↗
    Wesley Mathis
    argument technical communication affect and writing book reviews
  3. Pedagogy Oct 2022
    Contributors ↗
    rhetorical criticism first-year composition writing pedagogy teacher development argument assessment technical communication archival research multimodality gender and writing literary studies book reviews editorial matter
  4. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Mar 2020
    Using a Transfer-Focused Writing Pedagogy to Improve Undergraduates’ Lab Report Writing in Gateway Engineering Laboratory Courses ↗
    Dave Kim; Wendy M. Olson
    rhetorical criticism genre theory first-year composition writing pedagogy basic writing teacher development argument transfer assessment technical communication professional writing scientific writing book reviews
  5. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Mar 2017
    Communicating Mobility and Technology: A Material Rhetoric for Persuasive Transportation [by Pflugfelder, E.H.; Book review] ↗
    Aimee Kendall Roundtree
    classical rhetoric rhetorical criticism argument technical communication professional writing body and rhetoric book reviews