Written Communication Jan 2019 OA PDF

Writing and Conceptual Learning in Science: An Analysis of Assignments

Anne Ruggles Gere University of Michigan–Ann Arbor ; Naitnaphit Limlamai University of Michigan–Ann Arbor ; Emily Wilson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor ; Kate MacDougall Saylor ; Raymond Pugh University of Wisconsin–Platteville

Abstract

This systematic review of 46 published articles investigates the constructs employed and the meanings assigned to writing in writing-to-learn assignments given to students in science courses. Using components of assignments associated with the greatest learning gains—meaning making, clear expectations, interactive writing processes, and metacognition—this review illuminates the constructs of writing that yield conceptual learning in science. In so doing, this article also provides a framework that can be used to evaluate writing-to-learn assignments in science, and it documents a new era in research on writing to learn in science by showing the increased rigor that has characterized studies in this field during the past decade.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2019-01-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088318804820
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Bronze
Topics
writing across the curriculum book reviews
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Finkenstaedt-Quinn et al. (2024)
    Student Experiences With Peer Review and Revision for Writing-to-Learn in a Che…
    Written Communication
  2. Finkenstaedt-Quinn et al. (2024)
    Reading, receiving, revising: A case study on the relationship between peer rev…
    Assessing Writing
  3. Lin et al. (2023)
    A Systematic Review on Inquiry-Based Writing Instruction in Tertiary Settings
    Written Communication
  4. Finkenstaedt-Quinn et al. (2021)
    Utilizing Peer Review and Revision in STEM to Support the Development of Concep…
    Written Communication

References (47) · 6 in this index

  1. ACKERMAN (1993)
    The Promise of Writing to Learn
    Written Communication
  2. Anderson et al. (2015)
    The Contributions of Writing to Learning and Development: Results from a Large-…
    Research in the Teaching of English
  3. 10.2307/1170176
     ↗
  4. 10.1037/xap0000119
     ↗
  5. 10.3102/00346543074001029
     ↗
Show all 47 →
  1. 10.2307/j.ctt46nxp6
     ↗
  2. 10.37514/PER-B.2009.2324.2.14
     ↗
  3. Bazerman C. (2003)
    Writing selves/writing society
  4. Bereiter C. (1987)
    The psychology of written communication
  5. Chen X. (2013)
    STEM attrition: College Students’ paths Into and out of STEM fields
  6. 10.1021/ed085p873
     ↗
  7. Devitt A. (2008)
    Writing genres
  8. 10.5688/aj740463
     ↗
  9. Emig (1977)
    Writing as a Mode of Learning
    College Composition and Communication
  10. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.327
     ↗
  11. 10.1007/s11165-009-9128-y
     ↗
  12. Galbraith (2015)
    Conditions for writing to learn
    Journal of Writing Research
  13. 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
     ↗
  14. 10.1007/s10763-007-9082-y
     ↗
  15. 10.1021/ed500059r
     ↗
  16. 10.1002/tea.10128
     ↗
  17. Hand B. (1996)
    Australian Science Teachers Journal
  18. 10.1080/0950069032000070252
     ↗
  19. 10.1080/10862968709547610
     ↗
  20. Hayes R. Q. (2009)
    CSRDE STEM retention report
  21. 10.1023/A:1021913217147
     ↗
  22. 10.1177/147035720200100303
     ↗
  23. Luxford C. (2016)
    ACS Symposium Series
  24. 10.1080/09500693.2016.1221547
     ↗
  25. Melzer D. (2014)
    Assignments across the curriculum: A national study of college writing
  26. 10.1187/cbe.13-05-0097
     ↗
  27. Newell (1984)
    Learning from Writing in Two Content Areas: A Case Study/Protocol Analysis
    Research in the Teaching of English
  28. 10.1021/ed064p508
     ↗
  29. 10.3102/0034654307313793
     ↗
  30. 10.1007/s11423-008-9105-6
     ↗
  31. Prain V. (2005)
    Elementary science teacher education: Issues and practice
  32. 10.3102/0013189X16672642
     ↗
  33. 10.1187/cbe.11-08-0064
     ↗
  34. 10.1002/tea.3660310910
     ↗
  35. 10.5408/1.3559673
     ↗
  36. RUSSELL (1997)
    Rethinking Genre in School and Society: An Activity Theory Analysis
    Written Communication
  37. 10.1080/23752696.2018.1433546
     ↗
  38. Scardemalia M. (1986)
    Handbook of research on teaching
  39. 10.1002/tea.21208
     ↗
  40. Tierney R. (1985)
    The teacher-researcher: How to study writing in the classroom
  41. Vygotsky L. S. (1978)
    Mind in society
  42. Wingfield N. (2017)
    New York Times
CrossRef global citation count: 47 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication Mar 2026
    Book Review: Community Is the Way: Engaged Writing and Designing for Transformative Change by Knight, Aimée KnightAimée. (2022). Community Is the Way: Engaged Writing and Designing for Transformative Change. WAC Clearinghouse, University Press of Colorado. 141 pp. Open-Access Resource. ISBN: 978-1-64215-148-0. ↗
    Yingying Tang
    writing across the curriculum book reviews
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Dec 2025
    Book Review: Text at Scale: Corpus Analysis in Technical Communication CarradiniS.SwartsJ. (2024). Text at Scale: Corpus Analysis in Technical Communication. Denver, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse, University Press of Colorado. 152 pp. ↗
    Chen Chen
    writing across the curriculum technical communication quantitative research book reviews
  3. Composition Forum Apr 2025
    Review of Annette Vee, Tim Laquintano, and Carly Schnitzler’s TextGenEd: Teaching with Text Generation Technologies ↗
    writing across the curriculum teacher development artificial intelligence book reviews
  4. Pedagogy Oct 2023
    Contributors ↗
    rhetorical criticism first-year composition writing pedagogy writing across the curriculum two-year college teacher development collaborative writing assessment writing centers qualitative research multimodality literacy studies race and writing gender and writing disability studies affect and writing literary studies book reviews editorial matter
  5. Communication Design Quarterly Sep 2023
    Review of "User Experience as Innovative Academic Practice by Kate Crane and Kelli Cargile Cook," Crane, K., & Cargile Cook, K. (Eds.). (2022). User Experience as Innovative Academic Practice. The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.37514/TPC-B.2022.1367 ↗
    Meghalee Das
    writing pedagogy curriculum design writing across the curriculum technical communication professional writing book reviews