Abstract

Relying on the case of a mixed-methods study centered on patients’ strategies for establishing their credibility in clinical conversations, this essay argues that the more intentional and effective the participant recruitment and the more specific the inquiry, the more likely technical communication and rhetoric of science researchers are to encounter potentially powerful partners through which they might get and analyze compelling data and, thus, gain engaged audiences outside of their disciplines.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
2019-04-03
DOI
10.1080/10572252.2019.1588375
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (5)

  1. Written Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Communication Design Quarterly
  5. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

References (25) · 9 in this index

  1. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
  2. Academics are from Mars, practitioners are from Venus: Analyzing content alignment within…
    Technical Communication
  3. 10.2307/358602
  4. The basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory
  5. Designing and conducting mixed methods research
Show all 25 →
  1. Doing quantitative grounded theory
  2. 10.7208/chicago/9780226264196.001.0001
  3. Communication Design Quarterly
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Handbook of methodological approaches to community-based research
  6. Health humanities reader
  7. Technical Communication Quarterly
  8. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  9. 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2000.00107.x
  10. 10.1093/fampra/13.6.522
  11. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  12. 10.2307/j.ctv1220nc1
  13. Rhetoric Review
  14. 10.1007/978-3-642-19202-9_9
  15. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  16. 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
  17. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  18. Reflecting on research: Examining practitioner perspectives on the state of research in t…
    Technical Communication
  19. Technical Communication Quarterly
  20. 10.1177/0306312713488820