Abstract

Reader feedback is generally considered to be valuable input for writers who want to optimize their documents, but a reader-focused evaluation is often time-consuming. For this reason, we have developed Focus, a software tool for collecting reader comments more efficiently. The design and rationale of the software are described in this article. In a small-scale evaluation study, the results we obtained using Focus were compared to the reader feedback collected under the plus-minus method. It appeared that the number of problems detected per participant did not differ, but there were differences in the types of problems found. Focus participants appeared to comment more from a reviewer's and less from a user's perspective. Although the two methods are not interchangeable, Focus can be said to be a promising evaluation tool, deserving further research.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
2001-10-01
DOI
10.1207/s15427625tcq1004_2
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication

References (13) · 3 in this index

  1. Baker, Linda. "How Do We Know When We Don't Understand? Standards for Evaluating Text Comprehension." Metacog…
  2. De Jong, Menno. Reader Feedback in Text Design: Validity of the Plus-Minus Method for the Pretesting of Publi…
  3. T
  4. JBT
  5. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Show all 13 →
  1. Lentz, Leo, and Henk Pander Maat. "Evaluating Text Quality: Reader-Focused or Text-Focused?" Studies of Funct…
  2. IEEE Tramactions on Professional Communication
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. Schriver, Karen A. Dynamics in Document Design: Creating Text for Readers. New York: John Wiley, 1997.
  5. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  6. W
  7. Schumacher, Gary M., and Robert Waller. "Testing Design Altematives: A Comparison of Procedures." Designing U…
  8. NJ: Educational Technology Publications