Conceptualizing Empathy Competence: A Professional Communication Perspective

Melissa Fuller University of Twente ; Elanor Kamans Hanze University of Applied Sciences ; Mark van Vuuren University of Twente ; Marca Wolfensberger Hanze University of Applied Sciences ; Menno D.T. de Jong University of Twente

Abstract

Empathy competence is considered a key aspect of excellent performance in communication professions. But we lack an overview of the specific knowledge, attitudes, and skills required to develop such competence in professional communication. Through interviews with 35 seasoned communication professionals, this article explores the role and nature of empathy competence in professional interactions. The analysis resulted in a framework that details the skills, knowledge, and attitudinal aspects of empathy; distinguishes five actions through which empathy manifests itself; and sketches relationships of empathy with several auxiliary factors. The framework can be used for professional development, recruitment, and the design of communication education programs.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2021-07-01
DOI
10.1177/10506519211001125
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Cites in this index (5)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Also cites 64 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  2. 10.1016/j.bushor.2005.04.003
  3. 10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy001013
  4. 10.1016/j.edurev.2011.03.001
  5. 10.1023/B:JADD.0000022607.19833.00
  6. 10.1177/0093650215626984
  7. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262012973.003.0002
  8. 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000113
  9. 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2011.00683.x
  10. 10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.013
  11. 10.1016/j.concog.2005.06.004
  12. 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2007.00034.x
  13. 10.1177/2329488414525468
  14. 10.1080/03634523.2018.1504977
  15. 10.1108/02683940310511881
  16. 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143754
  17. 10.1080/00909882.2013.806991
  18. 10.5465/amd.2016.0024
  19. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199539956.003.0002
  20. 10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
  21. 10.1109/IPCC.2007.4464058
  22. 10.1186/1751-0759-1-22
  23. 10.1177/1080569912458966
  24. 10.1002/mar.20105
  25. 10.1108/JCOM-07-2016-0051
  26. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02096.x
  27. 10.1093/sw/56.2.141
  28. 10.5175/JSWE.2011.200900085
  29. 10.1037/a0029159
  30. 10.1177/107937390903100403
  31. 10.1177/0893318916650519
  32. 10.1186/1472-6920-14-219
  33. 10.1177/1088868310377395
  34. 10.1016/S0738-3991(99)00096-8
  35. 10.1080/00224540209603891
  36. 10.1109/47.649557
  37. 10.1080/0307507042000236371
  38. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.08.001
  39. 10.1080/00909880701434208
  40. 10.1098/rstb.2008.0318
  41. 10.1177/0146167204271569
  42. 10.1093/scan/nst191
  43. 10.1080/00909880128114
  44. 10.1177/0022167800402004
  45. 10.1002/job.714
  46. 10.1016/j.pec.2009.06.012
  47. 10.1007/s11606-012-2063-z
  48. 10.1007/3-540-29803-7_9
  49. 10.1177/2329488415572789
  50. 10.1177/001100007500500202
  51. 10.1080/10410236.2015.1110002
  52. 10.1080/00909880600769944
  53. 10.1097/00001888-200204000-00012
  54. 10.1177/1080569912450312
  55. 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00443.x
  56. 10.1001/jama.1997.03540320082047
  57. 10.1037/10877-000
  58. 10.1177/0893318915571350
  59. 10.1111/j.1741-5446.2000.00063.x
  60. 10.1002/jee.20159
  61. 10.1016/j.pec.2012.04.004
  62. 10.1177/0093650210362682
  63. 10.1023/A:1007766818397
  64. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02099.x
CrossRef global citation count: 31 View in citation network →