Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Jan 2005

A Syntactic Approach to Readability

Timothy D. Giles Georgia Southern University ; Brian Still Texas Tech University

Abstract

Focusing on the issue of readability, this article examines problems that readability formulas present to the technical communicator, especially in terms of interaction with government agencies, and focuses on readability formula requirements mandated by The Office of Health and Industry programs [OHIP] for medical technology product support literature. Because the Flesch Reading Ease and the Flesch-Kincaid formulas are widely available, they are probably the ones most frequently used. Contemporary readability scholars have overlooked the Golub Syntactic Density Formula, which evaluates prose according to a sentence's syntax at a deeper level than the number of words per sentence and the number of syllables per word. The authors recommend it as a tool for evaluating readability. How it might be applied with current computer applications is discussed.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2005-01-01
DOI
10.2190/phuc-gy8l-jrle-vmnn
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
technical communication digital rhetoric grammar and mechanics
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (5)

  1. Graham (2017)
    Data and lore in technical communication research: guest editorial
    Communication Design Quarterly
  2. Kreuter (2015)
    The US Intelligence Community's Mathematical Ideology of Technical Communication
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Garwood (2013)
    Metonymy and Plain Language
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Still (2010)
    A Dozen Years after Open Source's 1998 Birth, It's Time for OpenTechComm
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Kim et al. (2008)
    Keeping Users at the Center: Developing a Multimedia Interface for Informed Consent
    Technical Communication Quarterly

References (25) · 4 in this index

  1. Connatser (1999)
    Last Rites for Readability Formulas in Technical Communication
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Klare G. R. (1963)
    The Measurement of Readability
  3. Sprat T. (1958)
    History of the Royal Society
  4. 10.1145/344599.344634
     ↗
  5. 10.1145/344599.344638
     ↗
Show all 25 →
  1. 10.1145/344599.344641
     ↗
  2. 10.1145/344599.344637
     ↗
  3. 10.1145/344599.344645
     ↗
  4. McClure (1987)
    Readability formulas: Useful or useless?
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  5. Office of Health and Industry Programs, Appendix A: Readability. http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/ohip/guidance/1128.h…
  6. Flesch R. (1951)
    How To Test Readability
  7. 10.1007/BF02402555
     ↗
  8. Medtronic, Inc. (2002)
    About Your Medtronic Cardiac Resynchronization Pacemaker: Patient Manual
  9. Jurafsky D. (2000)
    Speech and Language Processing
  10. Zakaluk B. L. (1988)
    Readability: Its Past, Present, and Future
  11. Golub (1969)
    Linguistic Structures in Students’ Oral and Written Discourse
    Research in the Teaching of English
  12. Golub L. S. and Frederick W. E., Linguistic Structures in the Discourse of Fourth and Sixth Graders, Technica…
  13. Hunt K. (1965)
    Grammatical Structures Written at Three Grade Levels
  14. 10.2307/1165818
     ↗
  15. Loban W. (1963)
    The Language of Elementary School Children
  16. 10.1037/e520802009-001
     ↗
  17. O'Donnell R. C., Griffin W. J., and Norris R., Syntax of Kindergarten and Elementary School Children: A Trans…
  18. Golub L. S. (1974)
    Elementary English
  19. Chall J. S. (1995)
    Readability Revisited: The New Dale-Chall Readability Formula
  20. Giles (1990)
    The Readability Controversy: A Technical Writing Review
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
CrossRef global citation count: 12 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly Oct 2024
    Editors’ Use of Comprehensive Style Guides: The Case of Singular They ↗
    Jo Mackiewicz; Shaya Kraut; Allison Durazzi
    rhetorical criticism discourse analysis first-year composition writing pedagogy graduate education teacher development writing centers technical communication professional writing digital rhetoric multilingual writers grammar and mechanics literacy studies race and writing public rhetoric editorial matter
  2. Pedagogy Jan 2022
    Contributors ↗
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory discourse analysis african american rhetorics decolonial rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy basic writing writing across the curriculum graduate education teacher development argument collaborative writing transfer assessment portfolios writing program administration writing centers peer tutoring technical communication professional writing archival research digital rhetoric social media grammar and mechanics literacy studies race and writing gender and writing disability studies public rhetoric community literacy literary studies editorial matter
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Oct 2018
    Beyond Grammar: Tracking Perceptions of Quality in Student E-mail ↗
    Brian D. Blackburne; Carroll Ferguson Nardone
    rhetorical criticism technical communication digital rhetoric grammar and mechanics
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Oct 1985
    The Case against Computerized Analysis of Student Writings ↗
    Lawrence J. Oliver
    writing pedagogy assessment technical communication digital rhetoric grammar and mechanics
  5. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Jan 2026
    LinkedIn in Business and Technical Communication: A Textbook Analysis Grounded in Digital Literacy ↗
    Sarah Moore; Kathryn Lookadoo
    modern rhetorical theory teacher development technical communication digital rhetoric social media literacy studies