Whose Ideas?: The Technical Writer's Expertise in Inventio

Susan Harkness Regli Carnegie Mellon University

Abstract

Compelling arguments from researchers studying the rhetoric of science have convinced both scientists and humanists that technical writing involves invention, or discovery of the available means of argument. If we agree that inventio is crucial to technical writing, however, we encounter a problem: namely, that the rhetor engaged in invention as part of a technical writing process does not necessarily have expertise in the subject matter of the composition. What, then, is the expertise that the technical writer contributes to the invention process? Working from the notion that knowledge is an activity rather than a commodity [1], I argue that a technical writer's expertise in invention lies in an ability to adapt rhetorical heuristics to situations of interdisciplinary collaboration. This focus expands our understanding of how invention works when the goal of communication is producing knowledge across disciplinary boundaries, rather than winning an argument with persuasive techniques.1

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
1999-01-01
DOI
10.2190/73vw-ybuc-yhxw-wu0c
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (6)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 6 →
  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Cites in this index (1)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
Also cites 2 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.2307/378841
  2. 10.1145/289444.289501
CrossRef global citation count: 8 View in citation network →