Abstract

When the primary aim of global, professional communication expands to include rapport building in addition to information sharing, basic parts of the communication process must be reevaluated. Such an assessment was conducted through a case study of a team that adapted a US training seminar for a Japanese audience. The team's strong emphasis on the communicative aim of relationship building illustrated how traditional conceptions of rhetorical invention, packaging, delivery, and feedback collection might be revised. For practitioners and educators, the findings of this case study prompt a reevaluation of the rhetorical abilities that are required in global professional communication contexts.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2009-09-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2009.2025305
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (5)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  5. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

Cites in this index (6)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Show all 6 →
  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Also cites 11 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1037/0022-3514.55.6.1009
  2. 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1966.tb00804.x
  3. 10.1017/CBO9781139524599
  4. 10.1037//0033-295X.99.4.689
  5. 10.1093/oso/9780195094886.001.0001
    Different Games Different Rules Why Americans and Japanese Misunderstand Each Other  
  6. 10.1177/108056990306600402
  7. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    Politeness Some Universals in Language Use  
  8. 10.1016/S0147-1767(98)00004-2
  9. 10.1177/0022022195261007
  10. 10.1177/002194360304000301
  11. 10.1109/IPCC.2005.1494206