Issues of Validity in Intercultural Professional Communication Research

Barry Thatcher New Mexico State University

Abstract

This article explores three ways to design US empirical methods to be more valid and ethical in cross-cultural studies. First, intercultural researchers need to distinguish broad rhetorical and cultural patterns from regional, organizational, and personal patterns, a process that requires balancing the fact of difference with the need for generalization. Second, US researchers need to distinguish not only the differences in rhetorical patterns in a form of communication but also in the ways that form is used rhetorically. Third, researchers need to construct researcher-participant relationships that are sensitive to the values of organizational relationships in both cultures.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2001-10-01
DOI
10.1177/105065190101500403
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (8)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Show all 8 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Computers and Composition
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Cites in this index (5)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. College Composition and Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Also cites 9 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.2307/358742
  2. 10.2307/358602
  3. 10.1017/CBO9781139524599
  4. 10.2190/ETRC13
  5. 10.4324/9780203201220_chapter_3
  6. 10.4324/9780203201220_chapter_4
  7. 10.2190/ETRC1
  8. 10.1177/002194369803500107
  9. 10.1016/S1060-3743(99)00019-3
CrossRef global citation count: 28 View in citation network →