A Critique of Hall's Contexting Model

Peter W. Cardon University of South Carolina

Abstract

Edward Hall's model of low-context and high-context cultures is one of the dominant theoretical frameworks for interpreting intercultural communication. This article reports a meta-analysis of 224 articles in business and technical communication journals between 1990 and 2006 and addresses two primary issues: (a) the degree to which contexting is embedded in intercultural communication theory and (b) the degree to which the contexting model has been empirically validated. Contexting is the most cited theoretical framework in articles about intercultural communication in business and technical communication journals and in intercultural communication textbooks. An extensive set of contexting propositions has emerged in the literature; however, few of these propositions have been examined empirically. Furthermore, those propositions tested most frequently have failed to support many contexting propositions, particularly those related to directness. This article provides several recommendations for those researchers who seek to address this popular and appealing yet unsubstantiated and underdeveloped communication theory.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2008-10-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651908320361
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (8)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Computers and Composition
Show all 8 →
  1. Computers and Composition
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Cites in this index (21)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Show all 21 →
  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  6. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  7. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  8. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  9. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  10. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  11. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  12. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  13. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  14. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  15. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  16. Technical Communication Quarterly
Also cites 34 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1177/002194369202900306
  2. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
  3. 10.1075/z.87.04cam
  4. 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
  5. 10.1177/1080569904270986
  6. 10.1177/108056999706000404
  7. 10.1016/S0147-1767(96)00041-7
  8. 10.1177/108056990306600212
  9. 10.3102/0013189X005010003
  10. 10.1177/1080569904270987
  11. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00377.x
  12. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1986.tb00090.x
  13. 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.tb00310.x
  14. 10.1080/00208825.1983.11656358
  15. 10.1177/0022002184015004003
  16. 10.1016/0090-2616(88)90009-5
  17. 10.1177/108056990206500104
  18. 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199809)15:6<507::AID-MAR2>3.0.CO;2-A
  19. 10.1163/1571806041262070
  20. 10.1177/002194369703400305
  21. 10.17763/haer.52.1.0114v8756m170618
  22. 10.1177/002194369102800306
  23. 10.1177/002194369202900305
  24. 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2007.01.002
  25. 10.1037/1082-989X.1.4.331
  26. 10.1111/1467-9280.00287
  27. 10.1111/j.1464-0597.1999.tb00047.x
  28. 10.1177/108056999806100414
  29. 10.1080/10641734.2004.10505165
  30. 10.1177/108056999806100403
  31. 10.1016/S0147-1767(98)00004-2
  32. 10.1177/002194360003700102
  33. 10.1177/108056990106400109
  34. 10.1177/0893318901143002
CrossRef global citation count: 95 View in citation network →