Abstract

This article forwards a document analysis of the University Press of Colorado's publicly available academic and scholarly publishing policies and procedure materials. This analysis utilizes the online heuristic "Anti-Racist Scholarly Reviewing Practices: A Heuristic for Editors, Reviewers, and Authors," (ARRH) and a framework developed by the author that works to pinpoint places within publishing policy and process documents that may allow for discriminatory and oppressive practice. To conclude, this article forwards tangible changes to academic publishing process documents to ensure that inclusion remains an important consideration in the drafting of publishing policy and guideline documents.

Journal
Communication Design Quarterly
Published
2024-03-01
DOI
10.1145/3627691.3627694
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Communication Design Quarterly

Cites in this index (13)

  1. Communication Design Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Show all 13 →
  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
  6. Technical Communication Quarterly
  7. Technical Communication Quarterly
  8. Technical Communication Quarterly
Also cites 8 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1080/02703149.2019.1684681
  2. 10.1080/01419870.2020.1718728
  3. 10.1145/3472714.3473654
  4. 10.1097/acm.0000000000002388
  5. 10.2307/3311882
  6. 10.1177/1745691620927709
  7. 10.1109/TPC.2022.3144824
  8. 10.4324/9780429198748
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network →