Abstract

Background : Under the Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution, law enforcement agencies are required to draft and uphold a Use of Force document to safeguard the rights of the public. This document, in its most successful form, defines use of force and offers specific core principles that outline de-escalation tactics and techniques to reinforce use of force and deadly force as a last resort. What is missing from the conversation of this policy is an analysis of the rhetorical choices within each document, and the understanding that these documents are rarely written with social justice in mind; rather, they are focused on legalese and protecting the individual departments and the police officer responsible for using force. Literature review : The Use of Force document is a genre of policy that academics have been drawn to, especially in consideration of social justice. With a rise in law enforcement violent interactions with historically marginalized groups of the public, policy analysis is necessary. Research questions : 1. What key terms, concepts, and narratives are used within each document to reinforce oppressive ideology? 2. What rhetorical moves give agency of force to officers through various terminology? 3. What does an analysis of these policy documents reveal for technical and professional communicators regarding our role in social-justice-driven work? Research methods : I performed a rhetorical analysis of each document, pinpointing words, phrases, and sections that were unique to the specific text. NVivo qualitative research software was used to create word trees, where word frequencies were analyzed to uncover each department's situational position and the implication of such. Results and discussion : The analysis revealed that of the two documents under review, one tended to humanize not only the situational officer, who is incapable of being neutral, and the person whom force is being used against. The other tended to reflect policy-driven terminology that works to dehumanize the person involved with the officer and continues to uphold oppressive rhetoric. Conclusion : Technical communicators have a responsibility to insert themselves in issues of injustice. An analysis of these policy documents reveals areas of revision, areas where the public should be involved, and is a move toward further accountability regarding police brutality against historically marginalized communities.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2022-03-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2022.3144824
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Communication Design Quarterly
  2. Communication Design Quarterly

References (47) · 16 in this index

  1. The system is working the way it is supposed to: The limits of criminal justice reform
    Freedom Center J
  2. Police use of force: An examination of modern policing practices
  3. 10.1177/1080569911404407
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Show all 47 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. What is public policy?
  3. 10.1111/spol.12211
  4. Agendas and Instability in American Politics
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
  6. Quickfacts, Minneapolis city, Minnesota
  7. Technical Communication Quarterly
  8. Quickfacts Camden City, New Jersey
  9. Technologies of disenfranchisement: Literacy tests and black voters in the US from 1890 to 1965
    Tech Commun
  10. Technical Communication Quarterly
  11. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  12. The long, painful history of police brutality in the U.S.
    Smithsonian Mag
  13. Records of the Wickersham Commission on Law Observance and Enforcement
  14. 10.1017/CBO9780511499449
  15. 10.1177/0011128701047001006
  16. Communication Design Quarterly
  17. 10.29173/alr424
  18. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  19. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  20. Police efficiency and the Fourth Amendment
    Indiana Law J
  21. 10.4324/9780429198748
  22. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  23. Use of Force
  24. Reporting Use of Force
  25. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  26. City and town population totals: 2010-2019
  27. Technical Communication Quarterly
  28. Technical Communication Quarterly
  29. Minnesota Session Laws - 1993, Regular Session
  30. Minga Perú’s strategy for social change in the Peruvian Amazon: A rhetorica…
    Rhetor Prof Commun Globaliz
  31. Reforming police use-of-force practices: A case study of the Cincinnati Police Department
    Columbia J Law Soc Problems
  32. The just use of imagination: A call to action
  33. Understanding police use of force: A review of the evidence
    Southwest J Criminal Justice
  34. Cultural identity and diaspora
    Identity Community Culture Difference
  35. Local police departments: Policies and procedures, 2016
  36. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  37. Technical Communication Quarterly
  38. 10.1016/j.ijlcj.2019.100358