Abstract

Drawing on an analysis of a usability teaching case with users who are deaf and who communicate using American Sign Language, we argue that there is a need for industry and the academy to refocus on more accessible testing practices, situated more decidedly within the social, cultural, and historical contexts of users. We offer guidelines for more inclusive practices for testing with users who are deaf prompting designers, developers, and students to think about systems of behavior, such as audism, cultural appropriation, and technological paternalism that undermine accessibility in their design and practices. More broadly, we propose ways in which instructors of technical communication can leverage usability tools and research methods to help students better understand their users for any artifact they design and create.

Journal
Communication Design Quarterly
Published
2018-10-01
DOI
10.1145/3282665.3282668
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Gold
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (12)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Computers and Composition
  4. Communication Design Quarterly
  5. Communication Design Quarterly
Show all 12 →
  1. Communication Design Quarterly
  2. Communication Design Quarterly
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Communication Design Quarterly
  5. Communication Design Quarterly
  6. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  7. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

References (27)

  1. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. (2012 February 1). Code of ethics of engineers. Retrieved from http…
  2. 10.1093/deafed/enh025
  3. 10.1080/10400435.2010.483652
  4. Coherent Market Insights. (2016). Market research reports by Coherent Market Insights. Retrieved from https:/…
  5. Department of Linguistics. (2016 May 23). Open Letter to UW Office of News and Information SignAloud Project …
Show all 27 →
  1. Elmore K. (2013). Embracing interdependence: Technology developers autistic users and technical communicators…
  2. Erard M. (2017 November 9). Why sign-language gloves don't help deaf people. The Atlantic. Retrieved from htt…
  3. Flores J. M. (2016 October 19). Let's talk about SignAloud - Jessica Marie Flores. Retrieved from https://www…
  4. 10.1162/074793603322545019
  5. Katie's Online. (2016 April 27). Yes I've seen the signing gloves. Retrieved from katies.online/katiesblog/in…
  6. An introduction to this special issue
    Technical Communication
  7. 10.1080/10400435.2010.483649
  8. Meloncon L. (2013). Toward a theory of technological embodiment. In L. Meloncon (Ed.) Rhetorical accessibilit…
  9. 10.1353/sls.2006.0019
  10. National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders. (2016). NIDCD. Retrieved from https://www.n…
  11. Thomas Pryor and Navid Azodi. (n.d.). LEMELSON-MIT. Retrieved from http://lemelson.mit.edu/winners/thomas-pry…
  12. 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.11.001
  13. 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00277.x
  14. 10.1179/1557069X13Y.0000000020
  15. 10.1145/2049536.2049594
  16. UW undergraduate team wins $10 000 Lemelson-MIT Student Prize for gloves that translate sign language. (2016 …
  17. Conducting usability studies with users who are elderly or have disabilities
    Technical Communication
  18. Wei Will (2016 April 27). These gloves can convert sign language into spoken English. Business Insider. Retri…
  19. World Federation of the Deaf. (2016). Sign language. Retrieved from https://wfdeaf.org/human-rights/crpd/sign…
  20. World Health Organization. (2016 May). Assistive technology: Fact sheet. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/me…
  21. World Health Organization. (2017 February). Deafness and hearing loss: Fact sheet. Retrieved from http://www.…
  22. Technological paternalism
    ASEE Prism