Abstract

Drawing on an analysis of a usability teaching case with users who are deaf and who communicate using American Sign Language, we argue that there is a need for industry and the academy to refocus on more accessible testing practices, situated more decidedly within the social, cultural, and historical contexts of users. We offer guidelines for more inclusive practices for testing with users who are deaf prompting designers, developers, and students to think about systems of behavior, such as audism, cultural appropriation, and technological paternalism that undermine accessibility in their design and practices. More broadly, we propose ways in which instructors of technical communication can leverage usability tools and research methods to help students better understand their users for any artifact they design and create.

Journal
Communication Design Quarterly
Published
2018-10-01
DOI
10.1145/3282665.3282668
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (6)

  1. Communication Design Quarterly
  2. Communication Design Quarterly
  3. Communication Design Quarterly
  4. Communication Design Quarterly
  5. Communication Design Quarterly
Show all 6 →
  1. Communication Design Quarterly

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 11 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1093/deafed/enh025
  2. 10.1080/10400435.2010.483652
  3. Elmore K. (2013). Embracing interdependence: Technology developers autistic users and technical communicators…
  4. 10.1162/074793603322545019
  5. 10.1080/10400435.2010.483649
  6. Meloncon L. (2013). Toward a theory of technological embodiment. In L. Meloncon (Ed.) Rhetorical accessibilit…
  7. 10.1353/sls.2006.0019
  8. 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.11.001
  9. 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00277.x
  10. 10.1179/1557069X13Y.0000000020
  11. 10.1145/2049536.2049594
CrossRef global citation count: 22 View in citation network →