Abstract

As Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) utilized in workplaces, classrooms, and community organizations continue to proliferate, it follows that the kinds of knowledge necessary to assemble those technologies in order to engage in effective professional communication are becoming increasingly complex. This article details a study conducted of two student teams engaged in a service-learning class in which they were tasked with producing high-quality digital products---a mini-documentary and a simple, but interactive website---for client organizations---an art classroom in a local public school and a mentoring initiative within a local non-profit. The main findings of this study are that students mobilized a variety of resources and created a flexible network of technologies, knowledges, people, and modes of communication in order to address issues pertinent to their clients. In addition, I argue that the most important resource students mobilized was knowledge itself, indicating that one of the most important aspects of digital composing may be in-depth, practical knowledge of technologies, modes, and the genres they involve. Ultimately, the implications of this limited, classroom-based case study are that a situated understanding of how to assemble knowledges for the effective design of communication within a given communication infrastructure may be more important than access to the most cutting-edge modes and technologies, especially when working with resource-poor organizational clients.

Journal
Communication Design Quarterly
Published
2013-11-01
DOI
10.1145/2559866.2559868
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Gold
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Reflections: A Journal of Community-Engaged Writing and Rhetoric

References (31) · 14 in this index

  1. Bay J. (2010). Networking pedagogies for professional writing students. The Writing Instructor. Retrieved May…
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Brown S. and Dobrin S. (2004). Ethnography unbound: From theory shock to critical praxis. Albany: State Unive…
  5. Cushman E. and Guinsatao Monberg (1998). T. Re-centering authority: Social reflexivity and re-positioning in …
Show all 31 →
  1. Devitt A. (2004). Writing genres. Carbondale IL: Southern Illinois University Press. Devitt A. (2004). Writin…
  2. College Composition and Communication
  3. 10.1145/2379057.2379075
  4. Grabill J. (2007). Writing community change: Designing technologies for citizen action. Cresskill NJ: Hampton…
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  6. Halliday M. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Baltimore…
  7. Critical ethnography, ethics, and work: Rearticulating labor
    JAC
  8. Written Communication
  9. Written Communication
  10. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  11. Written Communication
  12. 10.1023/B:COSU.0000014876.96003.be
  13. Continuum companion to discourse analysis (120--137).
  14. Technical Communication Quarterly
  15. Computers and Composition
  16. Retrieved
  17. Written Communication
  18. Ray R. (1993). The practice of theory: Teacher research in composition. Urbana IL: NCTE. Ray R. (1993). The p…
  19. Selber S. (2004). Multiliteracies for a digital age. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. Selber S…
  20. Technical Communication Quarterly
  21. Technical Communication Quarterly
  22. Spinuzzi C. (2008). Network: Theorizing knowledge work in telecommunications. New York: Cambridge University …
  23. Writing Selves/Writing Societies. Retrieved
  24. 10.1287/isre.7.1.111
  25. Yin R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks CA: SAGE. Yin R. (2009). Case s…
  26. Technical Communication Quarterly