How Timing and Authority in Peer Review Impact STEM Students: A Comparative Assessment of Writing and Critical Thinking in Kinesiology Courses

Tereza Joy Kramer; Joe Zeccardi; Chi-An W. Emhoff; Claire Williams; Robin J. Dunn; Joshua Rose

doi:10.37514/atd-j.2022.18.3-4.06

Across the Disciplines Jan 2022 Open Access

How Timing and Authority in Peer Review Impact STEM Students: A Comparative Assessment of Writing and Critical Thinking in Kinesiology Courses

Tereza Joy Kramer California Northstate University ; Joe Zeccardi Saint Mary's College of California ; Chi-An W. Emhoff ; Claire Williams Saint Mary's College of California ; Robin J. Dunn Saint Mary's College of California ; Joshua Rose College of Alameda

Journal: Across the Disciplines
Published: 2022-01-01
DOI: 10.37514/atd-j.2022.18.3-4.06
CompPile: Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access: OA PDF Gold
Topics: argument assessment
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (0)

No references on file for this article.

CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network → Build reading path →

How Timing and Authority in Peer Review Impact STEM Students: A Comparative Assessment of Writing and Critical Thinking in Kinesiology Courses

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

References (0)

Related Articles