Abstract

In a cross-institutional study, this article shares research findings about business student perceptions and experiences using an automated writing assistant program based on traditional artificial intelligence. Using a mixed-methods approach, we share student responses to Grammarly’s suggested revisions and provide insight into students’ confidence levels and correctness in workplace written communication. Finally, this study concludes with a discussion of the implications of this work related to business communication education and research, as well as possibilities for the future.

Journal
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Published
2025-01-23
DOI
10.1177/23294906241310415
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (6)

  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  3. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  4. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  5. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Show all 6 →
  1. Computers and Composition
Also cites 16 works outside this index ↓
  1. Barrot J. S. (2023). Using automated written corrective feedback in the writing classrooms: Effects on L2 wri…
  2. 10.1037/a0029692
  3. Calma A., Cotronei-Baird V., Chia A. (2022). Grammarly: An instructional intervention for writing enhancement…
  4. Holmes W., Tuomi I. (2022). State of the art and practice in AI in education. European Journal of Education, …
  5. John P., Woll N. (2020). Using grammar checkers in an ESL context: An investigation of automatic corrective f…
  6. 10.1201/9781315366951
  7. McCarthy K. S., Roscoe R. D., Likens A. D., McNamara D. S. (2019). Checking it twice: Does adding spelling an…
  8. Moyer R. (1977). Why Johnny can’t proofread. Business Communication Quarterly, 40(4), 21–23. https://doi.org/…
  9. Muggleton S. (2014). Alan Turing and the development of artificial intelligence. AI Communications, 27, 3–10.…
  10. Olsen K. A., Williams J. G. (2004, September 1). Spelling and grammar checking using the Web as a text reposi…
  11. O’Neill R., Russell A. (2019). Stop! Grammar time: University students’ perceptions of the automated feedback…
  12. Sahu S., Vishwakarma Y., Kori J., Thakur J. (2020). Evaluating performance of different grammar checking tool…
  13. Turing A. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59(236), 433–460. https://academic.oup.com/mind…
  14. Wang Z. (2022). Computer-assisted EFL writing and evaluations based on artificial intelligence: A case from a…
  15. Winans M. D. (2021). Grammarly’s tone detector: Helping students write pragmatically appropriate texts. RELC …
  16. Yannakoudakis E. J., Fawthrop D. (1983). An intelligent spelling error corrector. Information Processing & Ma…
CrossRef global citation count: 4 View in citation network →