Abstract

This study examines the effect of company field trips on Vietnamese university students’ corporate social responsibility (CSR) awareness and their intentions to share CSR-related content. Utilizing pre- and postvisit surveys among 136 students, the research reveals that these trips significantly enhance students’ understanding of CSR, particularly its ethical dimensions, and encourage them to share CSR information through social media and word-of-mouth. The research also finds that the perceived image of the company representative plays a critical role in shaping students’ intentions to disseminate CSR information, with complex interactions affecting their overall CSR perceptions. These findings underscore the importance of field trips in CSR education and suggest that both companies and educational institutions should focus on ethical and legal aspects of CSR communication to maximize its impact.

Journal
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Published
2024-03-20
DOI
10.1177/23294906241237721
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (9)

  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  3. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  4. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  5. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Show all 9 →
  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  3. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  4. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 55 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1108/S2043-052320150000007010
  2. Bock D. E., Folse J. A. G., Black W. C. (2016). When frontline employee behavior backfires: Distinguishing be…
  3. 10.2307/257850
  4. 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00275.x
  5. 10.3390/ijerph18168275
  6. 10.1016/j.apmrv.2022.01.001
  7. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.036
  8. 10.1080/23311975.2016.1187783
  9. 10.1108/CCIJ-09-2021-0097
  10. 10.1111/basr.12082
  11. 10.1108/JHTT-12-2020-0321
  12. 10.1108/MD-01-2015-0015
  13. 10.4324/9780203100974
  14. 10.1108/IJCHM-09-2020-1054
  15. 10.13189/ujer.2019.071505
  16. 10.18870/hlrc.v1i1.18
  17. 10.2753/JOA0091-3367360402
  18. 10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
  19. 10.1177/1053825918761995
  20. 10.1509/jmkg.70.3.058
  21. 10.1002/csr.1892
  22. 10.1108/EJM-01-2015-0009
  23. 10.1177/21582440231205861
  24. 10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.11.005
  25. 10.1007/978-3-319-63480-7_11
  26. 10.1080/03055698.2016.1245604
  27. 10.1002/csr.1418
  28. 10.7441/joc.2021.04.06
  29. 10.1080/23311975.2021.1917333
  30. 10.1080/13683500.2021.1946019
  31. 10.1108/SBR-09-2020-0114
  32. 10.1111/j.1745-6606.2001.tb00102.x
  33. 10.1080/10494820.2019.1570279
  34. 10.1177/1053825917742165
  35. 10.1080/23322039.2022.2075600
  36. 10.1186/s40991-018-0032-5
  37. 10.1080/23311975.2023.2170522
  38. 10.1007/978-1-4684-2490-4_4
  39. 10.1007/978-3-030-42416-9_13
  40. 10.1108/IntR-09-2016-0276
  41. 10.1007/s10551-014-2177-9
  42. 10.18488/73.v10i2.3011
  43. 10.1177/21582440231213686
  44. 10.1080/23311975.2023.2188641
  45. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.008
  46. 10.4324/9780203868409
  47. 10.1108/JEIM-09-2018-0206
  48. 10.1108/13563281211196344
  49. 10.1509/jm.11.0485
  50. 10.1016/j.jhlste.2020.100285
  51. 10.1016/j.ausmj.2018.04.003
  52. 10.3846/tede.2021.14520
  53. 10.1007/s10551-017-3745-6
  54. 10.14254/2071-8330.2020/13-4/1
  55. 10.1080/21683565.2019.1607797
CrossRef global citation count: 16 View in citation network →