Legal and Ethical Implications of Website Accessibility

Zsuzsanna Bacsa Palmer ; Ralph Henry Palmer Indiana State University

Abstract

This article argues that business and professional communication practitioners, instructors, and students, besides becoming better informed about the legal context of website accessibility, should also become more aware of the ethical considerations of creating digital communication products that are inherently accessible for people with disabilities. Through a detailed review of the most important legal cases in the United States and discussion of ethical considerations concerning website accessibility for the disabled, we provide possible entrance points that will help instructors bring ethical considerations into the discussion of website accessibility. We urge instructors to regularly include disability in discussions of accessibility cases.

Journal
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Published
2018-12-01
DOI
10.1177/2329490618802418
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (7)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Show all 7 →
  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

References (63) · 4 in this index

  1. Access Now, Inc. v. Southwest Airlines, Co., 227 F. Supp. 2d 1312 (S.D. Fla. 2002).
  2. Accessible Instructional Materials in Higher Education Act, H.R. 6122, 114th Cong. (2016).
  3. Accessible Instructional Materials in Higher Education Act, H.R. 1772, 115th Cong. (2017).
  4. Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States
  5. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12189 (1990). Retrieved from https://www.ada.gov/…
Show all 63 →
  1. Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110-325, Stat. 3406 (2008). Retrieved from ht…
  2. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003
  3. Carparts Distribution Center Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Automotive Wholesaler’s Association of N…
  4. Caumont A. (2013). Who’s not online? 5 factors tied to the digital divide. Retrieved from http://www.pewresea…
  5. Cullen v. Netflix, Inc., 880 F. Supp. 2d 1017 (N.D. Cal. 2012).
  6. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003
  7. Earll v. eBay Inc., No. 5:11-CV-00262-EJD (N.D. Cal. 2012).
  8. Structured negotiation: A winning alternative to lawsuits
  9. Texas Journal on Civil Liberties & Civil Rights
  10. Fox S. (2011). Americans living with disability and their technology profile. Retrieved from http://www.pewin…
  11. 10.1145/2435215.2435217
  12. Business: Its legal, ethical, and global environment
  13. Alabama Law Review
  14. The development of disability rights under international law: From charity to human rights
  15. 10.1057/9780230356108
  16. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  17. Larimer S. (2017, March 15). Why UC-Berkeley is restricting access to thousands of online lecture videos. The…
  18. 10.2190/RAAC9
  19. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003
  20. BCOM
  21. Rhetorical accessability: At the intersection of technical communication and disability studies
  22. Business and administrative communication
  23. 10.1145/1562164.1562197
  24. Loriggio P. (2010, November 29). Court orders Ottawa to make websites accessible to blind. The Globe and Mail…
  25. Media Access Australia. (2015). Coles web accessibility case settled. Retrieved from https://mediaaccess.org.…
  26. National Association of the Deaf, et al. v. Harvard University, et al., No. 3:15-cv-30023 (D. Mass. 2015)
  27. National Association of the Deaf, et al. v. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, No. 3:15-cv-30024 (D. Mass…
  28. National Association of the Deaf v. Netflix, Inc., 869 F. Supp. 2d 196 (D. Mass. 2012).
  29. National Federation of the Blind v. Target Corp. 582 F. Supp. 2d 1185 (N.D. Cal. 2007).
  30. Nomensa. (2007). United Nations Global audit of web accessibility. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/disabilit…
  31. Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. (2015). Nondiscrimination on the basis of disability; accessibi…
  32. 10.1016/j.giq.2011.02.002
  33. Oswal S. K. (2013). Ableism. In M. Yergeau et al., multimodality in motion: Disability in kairotic spaces. Ka…
  34. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  35. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  36. Writing Program Administration
  37. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003
  38. Parker v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 121 F.3d 1006 (6th Cir. 1997).
  39. Parry M. (2010, November 12). ADA compliance is a “major vulnerability” for online programs. The Chronicle of…
  40. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003
  41. Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794d (1998).
  42. Selfe C. L., Howes F. (2013). Over there: Disability studies and composition. In M. Yergeau et al., Multimoda…
  43. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003
  44. Stein J. A. (2015). U.S. Department of Justice does business no favors by significantly delaying website acce…
  45. Target. (2010). National Federation of the Blind nonvisual accessibility web certification granted to Target.…
  46. Technology, Equality, and Accessibility in College and Higher Education Act, H.R. 3505, 113th Cong. (2013). R…
  47. Extraordinary bodies: Figuring physical disability in American culture and literature
  48. United Nations Division for Social Policy and Development. (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with d…
  49. United Nations Human Rights Council. (2011). Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection…
  50. U.S. Access Board. (2017). Information and communication technology (ICT) final standards and guidelines. Ret…
  51. U.S. Census Bureau. (2012). Nearly 1 in 5 people have a disability in the U.S., Census Bureau reports: Report…
  52. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003
  53. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (n.d.). Fact sheet on the EEOC’s final regulations implementing…
  54. Web Accessibility Initiative. (n.d.). A cautionary tale of inaccessibility: Target Corporation. Retrieved fro…
  55. 10.5210/fm.v16i11.3666
  56. World Health Organization. (n.d.). 10 facts on disability. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/features/factfil…
  57. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  58. Zdenek S. (2009). Accessible podcasting: College students on the margins in the new media classroom. Retrieve…